<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PC Manufacturers Embrace 64-Bit Vista</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/pc-manufacturers-embrace-64-bit-vista/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/pc-manufacturers-embrace-64-bit-vista/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 20:26:55 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Estep</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/pc-manufacturers-embrace-64-bit-vista/comment-page-1/#comment-137985</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Estep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 18:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=12461#comment-137985</guid>
		<description>In my case, I definitely do know better; I&#039;m running XP Professional x64 Edition on (don&#039;t laugh) a Celeron-D 3.46 (Cedar Mill) with 512 MB of RAM and onboard VIA/S3 Unichrome IGP graphics (I&#039;m entering this post via IE 6 x64).  The real surprise is that XP64 is *faster* than XP32 on the same hardware (and whacks XP32 on what would seemingly be more capable non--x64 hardware, such as P4 Northwood-Cs like mine).  Let&#039;s be honest: when most of us think x64 (even XP x64) we think XEONs.  Opterons.  Even the odd Core2Quad.  We *certainly* don&#039;t think in terms of Celerons (despite that Intel hasn&#039;t made a non-64-bit Celeron for desktops since 2006).  XP64 and this seemingly mouse-powered PC go together like the ingredients in a BK Steakhouse Butger - deliciously fast.  (In fact, here&#039;s another welcome surprise; I had not a single driver issue, despite the VIA chipset, with XP64.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my case, I definitely do know better; I&#8217;m running XP Professional x64 Edition on (don&#8217;t laugh) a Celeron-D 3.46 (Cedar Mill) with 512 MB of RAM and onboard VIA/S3 Unichrome IGP graphics (I&#8217;m entering this post via IE 6 x64).  The real surprise is that XP64 is *faster* than XP32 on the same hardware (and whacks XP32 on what would seemingly be more capable non&#8211;x64 hardware, such as P4 Northwood-Cs like mine).  Let&#8217;s be honest: when most of us think x64 (even XP x64) we think XEONs.  Opterons.  Even the odd Core2Quad.  We *certainly* don&#8217;t think in terms of Celerons (despite that Intel hasn&#8217;t made a non-64-bit Celeron for desktops since 2006).  XP64 and this seemingly mouse-powered PC go together like the ingredients in a BK Steakhouse Butger &#8211; deliciously fast.  (In fact, here&#8217;s another welcome surprise; I had not a single driver issue, despite the VIA chipset, with XP64.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/pc-manufacturers-embrace-64-bit-vista/comment-page-1/#comment-137656</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 20:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=12461#comment-137656</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-137620&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Tim wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;I think actually most of those users who report using 64bit OS are probably running something like AMD-64 with 32 bit windows, and don’t know any better.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
Could be. I used to tell people that if they don&#039;t know what they&#039;re running that they are probably running 32-bit. But now that may not always be the case seeing that computers are shipping with the 64-bit version.

&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-137623&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;BritSwedeGuy wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;I’ve been running XP 64 for over a year, the only problem has been a couple of applications not working and some hardware drivers not being available. XP 32 and Ubuntu are also on there, but XP 64 remains the OS I use 99% of the time. It will be a long time before I’d consider installing crappy Vista on there, in any flavour.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
Glad to hear that you&#039;ve managed to get by with using 64-bit XP for over a year. You&#039;re definitely one of the earlier adopters then.

&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-137626&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Anonymous wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Which ASUS models? 64-bit Vista’s been a big step up from XP 64, and I’m trying to find a notebook that isn’t crippled by the 3gb limit.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
The one I pulled up was the G2Sg, but there may be others.
http://usa.asus.com/products.aspx?l1=5&amp;l2=133&amp;l3=491&amp;l4=0&amp;model=2021&amp;modelmenu=2

&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-137632&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;S4L0 wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Adler your liscence will work with a 64 bit disc. Just make sure you use an OEM 64 bit DVD to install. You might have to call Microsoft to activate but that will only take 3-5 minutes.  ;)&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
Huh, I had no idea that a 32-bit serial would work on a 64-bit installation as well. That&#039;s pretty cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-137620" rel="nofollow">Tim wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>I think actually most of those users who report using 64bit OS are probably running something like AMD-64 with 32 bit windows, and don’t know any better.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Could be. I used to tell people that if they don&#8217;t know what they&#8217;re running that they are probably running 32-bit. But now that may not always be the case seeing that computers are shipping with the 64-bit version.</p>
<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-137623" rel="nofollow">BritSwedeGuy wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>I’ve been running XP 64 for over a year, the only problem has been a couple of applications not working and some hardware drivers not being available. XP 32 and Ubuntu are also on there, but XP 64 remains the OS I use 99% of the time. It will be a long time before I’d consider installing crappy Vista on there, in any flavour.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Glad to hear that you&#8217;ve managed to get by with using 64-bit XP for over a year. You&#8217;re definitely one of the earlier adopters then.</p>
<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-137626" rel="nofollow">Anonymous wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>Which ASUS models? 64-bit Vista’s been a big step up from XP 64, and I’m trying to find a notebook that isn’t crippled by the 3gb limit.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>The one I pulled up was the G2Sg, but there may be others.<br />
[<a href='http://usa.asus.com/products.aspx?l1=5&#038;l2=133&#038;l3=491&#038;l4=0&#038;model=2021&#038;modelmenu=2' rel='nofollow'>usa.asus.com</a>]</p>
<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-137632" rel="nofollow">S4L0 wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>Adler your liscence will work with a 64 bit disc. Just make sure you use an OEM 64 bit DVD to install. You might have to call Microsoft to activate but that will only take 3-5 minutes.  <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Huh, I had no idea that a 32-bit serial would work on a 64-bit installation as well. That&#8217;s pretty cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adler</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/pc-manufacturers-embrace-64-bit-vista/comment-page-1/#comment-137642</link>
		<dc:creator>Adler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 14:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=12461#comment-137642</guid>
		<description>S4L0 thank you for your comment! :) I will probably make a try. Nothing really to lose, as I am almost not using Windows anymore (switched to Ubuntu). Regards!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>S4L0 thank you for your comment! <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  I will probably make a try. Nothing really to lose, as I am almost not using Windows anymore (switched to Ubuntu). Regards!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S4L0</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/pc-manufacturers-embrace-64-bit-vista/comment-page-1/#comment-137633</link>
		<dc:creator>S4L0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 11:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=12461#comment-137633</guid>
		<description>Oh and I forgot to mention you can&#039;t &#039;update&#039; to a 64 bit OS, you need to do a clean install.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh and I forgot to mention you can&#8217;t &#8216;update&#8217; to a 64 bit OS, you need to do a clean install.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S4L0</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/pc-manufacturers-embrace-64-bit-vista/comment-page-1/#comment-137632</link>
		<dc:creator>S4L0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 11:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=12461#comment-137632</guid>
		<description>Adler your liscence will work with a 64 bit disc. Just make sure you use an OEM 64 bit DVD to install. You might have to call Microsoft to activate but that will only take 3-5 minutes.  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adler your liscence will work with a 64 bit disc. Just make sure you use an OEM 64 bit DVD to install. You might have to call Microsoft to activate but that will only take 3-5 minutes.  <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adler</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/pc-manufacturers-embrace-64-bit-vista/comment-page-1/#comment-137628</link>
		<dc:creator>Adler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 09:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=12461#comment-137628</guid>
		<description>And what about us who have a OEM version of Windows Vista 32-bit? Can we use the 32-bit serial number and update the OS to 64-bit using a different dvd? Has Microsoft any option to update the license, in case it is necessary?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And what about us who have a OEM version of Windows Vista 32-bit? Can we use the 32-bit serial number and update the OS to 64-bit using a different dvd? Has Microsoft any option to update the license, in case it is necessary?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/pc-manufacturers-embrace-64-bit-vista/comment-page-1/#comment-137626</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 08:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=12461#comment-137626</guid>
		<description>Which ASUS models? 64-bit Vista&#039;s been a big step up from XP 64, and I&#039;m trying to find a notebook that isn&#039;t crippled by the 3gb limit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which ASUS models? 64-bit Vista&#8217;s been a big step up from XP 64, and I&#8217;m trying to find a notebook that isn&#8217;t crippled by the 3gb limit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BritSwedeGuy</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/pc-manufacturers-embrace-64-bit-vista/comment-page-1/#comment-137623</link>
		<dc:creator>BritSwedeGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 08:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=12461#comment-137623</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been running XP 64 for over a year, the only problem has been a couple of applications not working and some hardware drivers not being available. XP 32 and Ubuntu are also on there, but XP 64 remains the OS I use 99% of the time. It will be a long time before I&#039;d consider installing crappy Vista on there, in any flavour.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been running XP 64 for over a year, the only problem has been a couple of applications not working and some hardware drivers not being available. XP 32 and Ubuntu are also on there, but XP 64 remains the OS I use 99% of the time. It will be a long time before I&#8217;d consider installing crappy Vista on there, in any flavour.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/pc-manufacturers-embrace-64-bit-vista/comment-page-1/#comment-137620</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 07:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=12461#comment-137620</guid>
		<description>I think actually most of those users who report using 64bit OS are probably running something like AMD-64 with 32 bit windows, and don&#039;t know any better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think actually most of those users who report using 64bit OS are probably running something like AMD-64 with 32 bit windows, and don&#8217;t know any better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
