Back last September, Netscape announced they were calling it quits with their “Digg-Clone” social media site and instead were starting something new called Propeller. Essentially Propeller is the Digg-Clone under a new name. They incorporated the typical Netscape orange and green colors into the new logo and called it a day. Nothing really changed with the service other than the name and the logo, until today.

Today Propeller 2.0 launched with a whole new look – a new logo, new colors, and new features. Take a look at the old versus new logo:

propeller logos.png

Aside from changes in color and looks, they also changed the rating system. Before they had an up-down system whereas now they have a 0-10.0 system. Readers can decide how well the story rates. The more people that give it a high rating, the better. They’re calling this “Prop It!” meaning users prop stories they find interesting.

We wouldn’t say we’re crazy about the interface simply because you have to scroll to see the bulk of the news items on the page. They took up important space at the top with the logo, menus, and a cartoon animation of their mascot who is “part professor, part citizen journalist,” and tells visitors that “you pick the news.”

Propeller.png

Another big change is that they are integrating Propeller further into AOL News and AOL.com (AOL owns Netscape). On those sites, Propeller news items will appear to get more exposure.

Overall we still see Propeller struggling to make a name for themselves in the social media space. They tried doing this under the Netscape brand and it didn’t work, then they tried launching Propeller which helped some, but we don’t think a new logo and colors, and a few changes in how the site operates is really going to help them. Any thoughts?

Source

  1. Why did Netscape drop a tornado on something that was awful to make it even worse?

    Their small community is fed up with this new layout apparently:
    [propeller.com]

  2. HA! That article you linked to was removed because it “violated their terms of use”. Guess they didn’t want people spreading bad thoughts about their new site.

  3. Two more popped up:
    [propeller.com]
    >> “The reviews are starting to roll in. There are only two possible conclusions so far: either the community will need some time to get used …”

    [propeller.com]
    >> “Looks like someone does not like criticism.”

    And here’s a screenshot of the story that was taken down:
    [i225.photobucket.com]

  4. Well, I can totally agree that the design sucks. They made it a lot (let’s be nice..) less good. Not only the logo got worse and you need to scroll more, they made it harder for users to vote as well. I think they fired or lost the usability person in the group :P I highly highly doubt they will gain any visitors with this change (on the contrary..)

  5. Change wrote:
    Well, I can totally agree that the design sucks. They made it a lot (let’s be nice..) less good. Not only the logo got worse and you need to scroll more, they made it harder for users to vote as well. I think they fired or lost the usability person in the group :P I highly highly doubt they will gain any visitors with this change (on the contrary..)

    The scrolling part is my problem to, Change. More than one article should be visible before you have to take your eyes off the page to mouse down further. Too much wasted space up at the top!

  6. Yeah, if there’s anything I have learned from Webdesign for Dummies it’s that the most important information should be above the fold line (i.e. the part of the page that is visible without scrolling down). :)

    Propeller wants us to know that if you “Got feedback on the new design? We’re Listening!” Looks like the PR department is trying to save Propeller’s butt. ;)