Comments on: Remember the Milk gets some Google Gears Love http://cybernetnews.com/remember-the-milk-gets-some-google-gears-love/ Technology News Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:57:44 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Ryan http://cybernetnews.com/remember-the-milk-gets-some-google-gears-love/comment-page-1/#comment-97942 Ryan Wed, 06 Jun 2007 20:58:49 +0000 http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/06/06/remember-the-milk-gets-some-google-gears-love/#comment-97942 Glad you like the logo! :) The only thing I can find in terms of feedback is the developer's forum, and that definitely isn't the right place to be throwing feature requests around. As the need arises, I'm sure they'll come up with something. Glad you like the logo! :)

The only thing I can find in terms of feedback is the developer’s forum, and that definitely isn’t the right place to be throwing feature requests around. As the need arises, I’m sure they’ll come up with something.

]]> By: Chris http://cybernetnews.com/remember-the-milk-gets-some-google-gears-love/comment-page-1/#comment-97865 Chris Wed, 06 Jun 2007 17:51:22 +0000 http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/06/06/remember-the-milk-gets-some-google-gears-love/#comment-97865 That's a great logo :) <blockquote>After all, if I’m getting ready to take a long flight I wouldn’t want to sit there visiting 20 websites to take each of them offline, and then when I’m connected again I have to put all of them back online. That would be a huge chore.</blockquote> And that's a very good point. I wonder if that's something we can look forward to in future betas? If not, "we" should probably find some feedback mechanisms. (where "we" is everyone agreeing that this would be necessary) That’s a great logo :)

After all, if I’m getting ready to take a long flight I wouldn’t want to sit there visiting 20 websites to take each of them offline, and then when I’m connected again I have to put all of them back online. That would be a huge chore.

And that’s a very good point. I wonder if that’s something we can look forward to in future betas? If not, “we” should probably find some feedback mechanisms. (where “we” is everyone agreeing that this would be necessary)

]]>