<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Rumor Confirmed: Google to buy FeedBurner</title> <atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/rumor-confirmed-google-to-buy-feedburner/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://cybernetnews.com/rumor-confirmed-google-to-buy-feedburner/</link> <description>Technology News</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 02:30:18 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/rumor-confirmed-google-to-buy-feedburner/#comment-96578</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 23:05:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/05/23/rumor-confirmed-google-to-buy-feedburner/#comment-96578</guid> <description>I just wonder how the advertising situation is going to be handled. Will Feedburner keep their advertising separate from Google or are they going to merge? I&#039;m wondering because Feedburner&#039;s advertising is based on the number of impressions (views) they receive whereas Google&#039;s are on the number of clicks. Google better handle the company right or there will be a lot of upset people.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just wonder how the advertising situation is going to be handled. Will Feedburner keep their advertising separate from Google or are they going to merge? I&#8217;m wondering because Feedburner&#8217;s advertising is based on the number of impressions (views) they receive whereas Google&#8217;s are on the number of clicks. Google better handle the company right or there will be a lot of upset people.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ashley</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/rumor-confirmed-google-to-buy-feedburner/#comment-96544</link> <dc:creator>Ashley</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 14:48:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/05/23/rumor-confirmed-google-to-buy-feedburner/#comment-96544</guid> <description>I&#039;m kinda excited to have RSS stats in Google Analytics. It&#039;s just one less web page I have to visit in a days time. And I agree, definitely interesting times ahead for FeedBurner.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m kinda excited to have RSS stats in Google Analytics. It&#8217;s just one less web page I have to visit in a days time. And I agree, definitely interesting times ahead for FeedBurner.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dean</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/rumor-confirmed-google-to-buy-feedburner/#comment-96529</link> <dc:creator>Dean</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 07:22:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/05/23/rumor-confirmed-google-to-buy-feedburner/#comment-96529</guid> <description>&lt;p&gt;I think RSS statistics in Google Analytics is only a matter of time now.  Such functionality is already offered in other analytics providers like &lt;a href=&quot;http://getclicky.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Clicky.&lt;/a&gt;  It should be interesting times ahead for Feedburner!&lt;/p&gt; </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think RSS statistics in Google Analytics is only a matter of time now.  Such functionality is already offered in other analytics providers like [<a href='http://getclicky.com/' rel='nofollow'>getclicky.com</a>]  It should be interesting times ahead for Feedburner!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 221/242 objects using disk: basic

Served from: cybernetnews.com @ 2012-05-27 12:09:33 -->
