<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Serious Excel Multiplication Bug Now Fixed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/serious-excel-multiplication-bug-now-fixed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/serious-excel-multiplication-bug-now-fixed/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:57:44 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ashley</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/serious-excel-multiplication-bug-now-fixed/comment-page-1/#comment-117733</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 02:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/10/serious-excel-multiplication-bug-now-fixed/#comment-117733</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-117694&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Andrew wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;now, I’m no coding expert, but it seems to me that if Microsoft wrote programs like they should (with high modularity) this patch should be a lot smaller. I’m guessing they did too many copy/pastes.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
I was surprised too that the patch was so big, but I&#039;d think there would be a good reason for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-117694" rel="nofollow">Andrew wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>now, I’m no coding expert, but it seems to me that if Microsoft wrote programs like they should (with high modularity) this patch should be a lot smaller. I’m guessing they did too many copy/pastes.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>I was surprised too that the patch was so big, but I&#8217;d think there would be a good reason for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/serious-excel-multiplication-bug-now-fixed/comment-page-1/#comment-117713</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 01:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/10/serious-excel-multiplication-bug-now-fixed/#comment-117713</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-117694&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Andrew wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;now, I’m no coding expert, but it seems to me that if Microsoft wrote programs like they should (with high modularity) this patch should be a lot smaller. I’m guessing they did too many copy/pastes.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
They&#039;ve got deadlines to meet. :)

&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-117708&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;netster007x wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;That’s good that they fixed it relatively quickly.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
I was actually suprised that it got pumped out so quick. I thought it would take a few months for them to finally get around to it. Guess they thought it was serious enough though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-117694" rel="nofollow">Andrew wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>now, I’m no coding expert, but it seems to me that if Microsoft wrote programs like they should (with high modularity) this patch should be a lot smaller. I’m guessing they did too many copy/pastes.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>They&#8217;ve got deadlines to meet. <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-117708" rel="nofollow">netster007x wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>That’s good that they fixed it relatively quickly.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>I was actually suprised that it got pumped out so quick. I thought it would take a few months for them to finally get around to it. Guess they thought it was serious enough though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: netster007x</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/serious-excel-multiplication-bug-now-fixed/comment-page-1/#comment-117708</link>
		<dc:creator>netster007x</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 00:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/10/serious-excel-multiplication-bug-now-fixed/#comment-117708</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s good that they fixed it relatively quickly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s good that they fixed it relatively quickly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/serious-excel-multiplication-bug-now-fixed/comment-page-1/#comment-117694</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 22:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/10/serious-excel-multiplication-bug-now-fixed/#comment-117694</guid>
		<description>now, I&#039;m no coding expert, but it seems to me that if Microsoft wrote programs like they should (with high modularity) this patch should be a lot smaller. I&#039;m guessing they did too many copy/pastes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>now, I&#8217;m no coding expert, but it seems to me that if Microsoft wrote programs like they should (with high modularity) this patch should be a lot smaller. I&#8217;m guessing they did too many copy/pastes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
