<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Serious Excel Multiplication Bug Now Fixed</title> <atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/serious-excel-multiplication-bug-now-fixed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://cybernetnews.com/serious-excel-multiplication-bug-now-fixed/</link> <description>Technology News</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:40:50 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Ashley</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/serious-excel-multiplication-bug-now-fixed/#comment-117733</link> <dc:creator>Ashley</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 02:53:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/10/serious-excel-multiplication-bug-now-fixed/#comment-117733</guid> <description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-117694&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Andrew wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;now, I’m no coding expert, but it seems to me that if Microsoft wrote programs like they should (with high modularity) this patch should be a lot smaller. I’m guessing they did too many copy/pastes.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; I was surprised too that the patch was so big, but I&#039;d think there would be a good reason for it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-117694" rel="nofollow">Andrew wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>now, I’m no coding expert, but it seems to me that if Microsoft wrote programs like they should (with high modularity) this patch should be a lot smaller. I’m guessing they did too many copy/pastes.</p></blockquote></div><p>I was surprised too that the patch was so big, but I&#8217;d think there would be a good reason for it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/serious-excel-multiplication-bug-now-fixed/#comment-117713</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 01:35:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/10/serious-excel-multiplication-bug-now-fixed/#comment-117713</guid> <description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-117694&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Andrew wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;now, I’m no coding expert, but it seems to me that if Microsoft wrote programs like they should (with high modularity) this patch should be a lot smaller. I’m guessing they did too many copy/pastes.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; They&#039;ve got deadlines to meet. :)&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-117708&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;netster007x wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;That’s good that they fixed it relatively quickly.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; I was actually suprised that it got pumped out so quick. I thought it would take a few months for them to finally get around to it. Guess they thought it was serious enough though.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-117694" rel="nofollow">Andrew wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>now, I’m no coding expert, but it seems to me that if Microsoft wrote programs like they should (with high modularity) this patch should be a lot smaller. I’m guessing they did too many copy/pastes.</p></blockquote></div><p>They&#8217;ve got deadlines to meet. <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p><div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-117708" rel="nofollow">netster007x wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>That’s good that they fixed it relatively quickly.</p></blockquote></div><p>I was actually suprised that it got pumped out so quick. I thought it would take a few months for them to finally get around to it. Guess they thought it was serious enough though.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: netster007x</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/serious-excel-multiplication-bug-now-fixed/#comment-117708</link> <dc:creator>netster007x</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 00:20:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/10/serious-excel-multiplication-bug-now-fixed/#comment-117708</guid> <description>That&#039;s good that they fixed it relatively quickly.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s good that they fixed it relatively quickly.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Andrew</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/serious-excel-multiplication-bug-now-fixed/#comment-117694</link> <dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 22:15:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/10/serious-excel-multiplication-bug-now-fixed/#comment-117694</guid> <description>now, I&#039;m no coding expert, but it seems to me that if Microsoft wrote programs like they should (with high modularity) this patch should be a lot smaller. I&#039;m guessing they did too many copy/pastes.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>now, I&#8217;m no coding expert, but it seems to me that if Microsoft wrote programs like they should (with high modularity) this patch should be a lot smaller. I&#8217;m guessing they did too many copy/pastes.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 230/249 objects using disk: basic

Served from: cybernetnews.com @ 2012-02-13 10:20:56 -->
