Comments on: Simplicity at its Finest: Quintessential Media Player http://cybernetnews.com/simplicity-at-its-finest-quintessential-media-player/ Technology News Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:40:50 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Zibusisohttp://cybernetnews.com/simplicity-at-its-finest-quintessential-media-player/#comment-152844 Zibusiso Sun, 30 May 2010 08:43:44 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/?p=16295#comment-152844 Comment is late but i have to say this. Windows Media player or any other don't have audio so good.Best sound balance ever.... equalizer is superb even the presets are Good Comment is late but i have to say this. Windows Media player or any other don’t have audio so good.Best sound balance ever…. equalizer is superb even the presets are Good

]]> By: Jonzhttp://cybernetnews.com/simplicity-at-its-finest-quintessential-media-player/#comment-148659 Jonz Thu, 16 Jul 2009 06:04:03 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/?p=16295#comment-148659 AIMP is the best audio player that i have discovered plus it 100% free. AIMP is the best audio player that i have discovered plus it 100% free.

]]> By: Ryanhttp://cybernetnews.com/simplicity-at-its-finest-quintessential-media-player/#comment-147050 Ryan Tue, 03 Mar 2009 02:33:57 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/?p=16295#comment-147050 <div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-147007" rel="nofollow">fab wrote:</a><blockquote>…and we have a winner in the ugliest software ever!</blockquote></div> It's skinnable... so changing the appearance isn't a big deal.<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-147034" rel="nofollow">MarcoMR wrote:</a><blockquote>I had been with WinAMP several years. When they launched v5.x it started to come full of crap added for who just wanted a simpler and useful player that also supported skins.</blockquote></div> I used WinAmp for years as well, but stopped once it started to become bloated. It's too bad they went down that path.<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-147037" rel="nofollow">blaszta wrote:</a><blockquote>Ryan, I think you should use the latest version default skin when taking the screen shot (since it quite different from their website).</blockquote></div> Oops! I installed it and was playing around. I grabbed their screenshot since they had the playlist in it already, but somehow didn't notice the differences in the skin. fab wrote:
…and we have a winner in the ugliest software ever!

It’s skinnable… so changing the appearance isn’t a big deal.

MarcoMR wrote:
I had been with WinAMP several years. When they launched v5.x it started to come full of crap added for who just wanted a simpler and useful player that also supported skins.

I used WinAmp for years as well, but stopped once it started to become bloated. It’s too bad they went down that path.

blaszta wrote:
Ryan, I think you should use the latest version default skin when taking the screen shot (since it quite different from their website).

Oops! I installed it and was playing around. I grabbed their screenshot since they had the playlist in it already, but somehow didn’t notice the differences in the skin.

]]> By: nimicitorhttp://cybernetnews.com/simplicity-at-its-finest-quintessential-media-player/#comment-147038 nimicitor Mon, 02 Mar 2009 09:43:09 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/?p=16295#comment-147038 Thanks for posting my recommendation although the screenshot is of the old version, the new version is white! Thanks for posting my recommendation although the screenshot is of the old version, the new version is white!

]]> By: blasztahttp://cybernetnews.com/simplicity-at-its-finest-quintessential-media-player/#comment-147037 blaszta Mon, 02 Mar 2009 06:03:05 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/?p=16295#comment-147037 Ryan, I think you should use the latest version default skin when taking the screen shot (since it quite different from their website).Anyway, I believe I use this player back in the 90's... Ryan, I think you should use the latest version default skin when taking the screen shot (since it quite different from their website).

Anyway, I believe I use this player back in the 90′s…

]]> By: MarcoMRhttp://cybernetnews.com/simplicity-at-its-finest-quintessential-media-player/#comment-147034 MarcoMR Sun, 01 Mar 2009 15:51:03 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/?p=16295#comment-147034 I had been with WinAMP several years. When they launched v5.x it started to come full of crap added for who just wanted a simpler and useful player that also supported skins.I had found AIMP a couple years ago ... and at the moment i don't trade it for nothing. I had been with WinAMP several years. When they launched v5.x it started to come full of crap added for who just wanted a simpler and useful player that also supported skins.

I had found AIMP a couple years ago … and at the moment i don’t trade it for nothing.

]]> By: fabhttp://cybernetnews.com/simplicity-at-its-finest-quintessential-media-player/#comment-147017 fab Fri, 27 Feb 2009 06:32:56 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/?p=16295#comment-147017 <div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-147014" rel="nofollow">QMP Fan wrote:</a><blockquote>Regarding QMP being ugly: (speicfically directed at fab)IMHO, this is perfectly okay if they have skins that look good (e.g. Firefox)Link: <a href="http://www.quinnware.com/skins.php?params=4353" rel="nofollow">http://www.quinnware.com/skins.....arams=4353</a>It seems a bit strange however that people would complain about the software being ugly without looking to see if the software is compatible with skins of not.</blockquote></div>i'm running GNU/Linux so i couldn't care more, though first impression is first impression. there's no second first impression which a skin chould change. if this was itunes, nobody would use it QMP Fan wrote:
Regarding QMP being ugly: (speicfically directed at fab)

IMHO, this is perfectly okay if they have skins that look good (e.g. Firefox)

Link: [quinnware.com]

It seems a bit strange however that people would complain about the software being ugly without looking to see if the software is compatible with skins of not.

i’m running GNU/Linux so i couldn’t care more, though first impression is first impression. there’s no second first impression which a skin chould change. if this was itunes, nobody would use it

]]> By: José Páezhttp://cybernetnews.com/simplicity-at-its-finest-quintessential-media-player/#comment-147015 José Páez Fri, 27 Feb 2009 05:08:39 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/?p=16295#comment-147015 LOL, hell yeah, it IS ugly. LOL, hell yeah, it IS ugly.

]]> By: QMP Fanhttp://cybernetnews.com/simplicity-at-its-finest-quintessential-media-player/#comment-147014 QMP Fan Thu, 26 Feb 2009 23:54:07 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/?p=16295#comment-147014 Regarding QMP being ugly: (speicfically directed at fab)IMHO, this is perfectly okay if they have skins that look good (e.g. Firefox)Link: http://www.quinnware.com/skins.php?params=4353It seems a bit strange however that people would complain about the software being ugly without looking to see if the software is compatible with skins of not. Regarding QMP being ugly: (speicfically directed at fab)

IMHO, this is perfectly okay if they have skins that look good (e.g. Firefox)

Link: [quinnware.com]

It seems a bit strange however that people would complain about the software being ugly without looking to see if the software is compatible with skins of not.

]]> By: Michael Dobrofskyhttp://cybernetnews.com/simplicity-at-its-finest-quintessential-media-player/#comment-147013 Michael Dobrofsky Thu, 26 Feb 2009 22:40:07 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/?p=16295#comment-147013 <div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-147007" rel="nofollow">fab wrote:</a><blockquote>…and we have a winner in the ugliest software ever!</blockquote></div>I don't understand how countless software programs rarely give thought or care about pleasing-to-the-eye design. Yes, this is ugly. fab wrote:
…and we have a winner in the ugliest software ever!

I don’t understand how countless software programs rarely give thought or care about pleasing-to-the-eye design. Yes, this is ugly.

]]>