<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: SocialHistory JavaScript Determines What Sites You&#8217;ve Visited</title> <atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/socialhistory-javascript-determines-what-sites-youve-visited/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://cybernetnews.com/socialhistory-javascript-determines-what-sites-youve-visited/</link> <description>Technology News</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:46:52 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Change</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/socialhistory-javascript-determines-what-sites-youve-visited/#comment-141416</link> <dc:creator>Change</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:39:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=14196#comment-141416</guid> <description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-141410&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ryan wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;If they develop a long enough list of sites they could get a good feel for what you visit. I guess it’s not really any worse than Google tracking what search results you click though.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; Yes, but they would have to keep you entertained long enough on one page to be able to load this list in the background and do something with it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-141410" rel="nofollow">Ryan wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>If they develop a long enough list of sites they could get a good feel for what you visit. I guess it’s not really any worse than Google tracking what search results you click though.</p></blockquote></div><p>Yes, but they would have to keep you entertained long enough on one page to be able to load this list in the background and do something with it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/socialhistory-javascript-determines-what-sites-youve-visited/#comment-141410</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:26:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=14196#comment-141410</guid> <description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-141388&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;David wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;I really don’t appreciate this type of information being collected without my knowledge. However, it does not seem to matter if you do not save any browsing history. When I went to the link to see it in action, It did not show any websites. That is because I do not allow Firefox to store any website history.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; Very true. If you don&#039;t save your browsing history it won&#039;t have anything to work off of.&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-141394&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Change wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;That’s quite an innovative trick! Will be tough to “fix” I imagine. It’s hard to use this maliciously though, so the effects of this technique are not *that* bad for privacy, luckily :)&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; It&#039;s not something that can really be exploited, but I still think it could be a privacy concern. If they develop a long enough list of sites they could get a good feel for what you visit. I guess it&#039;s not really any worse than Google tracking what search results you click though.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-141388" rel="nofollow">David wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>I really don’t appreciate this type of information being collected without my knowledge. However, it does not seem to matter if you do not save any browsing history. When I went to the link to see it in action, It did not show any websites. That is because I do not allow Firefox to store any website history.</p></blockquote></div><p>Very true. If you don&#8217;t save your browsing history it won&#8217;t have anything to work off of.</p><div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-141394" rel="nofollow">Change wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>That’s quite an innovative trick! Will be tough to “fix” I imagine. It’s hard to use this maliciously though, so the effects of this technique are not *that* bad for privacy, luckily <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p></blockquote></div><p>It&#8217;s not something that can really be exploited, but I still think it could be a privacy concern. If they develop a long enough list of sites they could get a good feel for what you visit. I guess it&#8217;s not really any worse than Google tracking what search results you click though.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Change</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/socialhistory-javascript-determines-what-sites-youve-visited/#comment-141394</link> <dc:creator>Change</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:06:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=14196#comment-141394</guid> <description>That&#039;s quite an innovative trick! Will be tough to &quot;fix&quot; I imagine. It&#039;s hard to use this maliciously though, so the effects of this technique are not *that* bad for privacy, luckily :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s quite an innovative trick! Will be tough to &#8220;fix&#8221; I imagine. It&#8217;s hard to use this maliciously though, so the effects of this technique are not *that* bad for privacy, luckily <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/socialhistory-javascript-determines-what-sites-youve-visited/#comment-141388</link> <dc:creator>David</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:04:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=14196#comment-141388</guid> <description>I really don&#039;t appreciate this type of information being collected without my knowledge. However, it does not seem to matter if you do not save any browsing history. When I went to the link to see it in action, It did not show any websites. That is because I do not allow Firefox to store any website history.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really don&#8217;t appreciate this type of information being collected without my knowledge. However, it does not seem to matter if you do not save any browsing history. When I went to the link to see it in action, It did not show any websites. That is because I do not allow Firefox to store any website history.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 234/253 objects using disk: basic

Served from: cybernetnews.com @ 2012-02-13 13:55:27 -->
