<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: StumbleUpon Redesigns With More Focus on &#8220;Social&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/stumbleupon-redesigns-with-more-focus-on-social/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/stumbleupon-redesigns-with-more-focus-on-social/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:45:09 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/stumbleupon-redesigns-with-more-focus-on-social/comment-page-1/#comment-92594</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 20:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/04/04/stumbleupon-redesigns-with-more-focus-on-social/#comment-92594</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re definitely right Dean...StumbleUpon&#039;s community is a lot easier to connect with than some of the other social network sites who pretty much start wars in the comments which hardly make the conversations worth reading.

What I would like to see from StumbleUpon now is an easy way for people to use the service no matter which browser they are using. I would think that they could come up with a Bookmarklet or something along those lines so that people can shuffle through some sites when they are looking to kill some time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re definitely right Dean&#8230;StumbleUpon&#8217;s community is a lot easier to connect with than some of the other social network sites who pretty much start wars in the comments which hardly make the conversations worth reading.</p>
<p>What I would like to see from StumbleUpon now is an easy way for people to use the service no matter which browser they are using. I would think that they could come up with a Bookmarklet or something along those lines so that people can shuffle through some sites when they are looking to kill some time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/stumbleupon-redesigns-with-more-focus-on-social/comment-page-1/#comment-92556</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 16:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/04/04/stumbleupon-redesigns-with-more-focus-on-social/#comment-92556</guid>
		<description>I agree.  I&#039;ve always been a fan of StumbleUpon.

I find the other social sites like Digg and Reddit cold and unfriendly, with many users just jumping on the latest hot topic or keen to see how many diggs a particular post can get, there doesn&#039;t seem to be much social element to those sites.  I find it really difficult to connect with users on those sites.  I&#039;ve seen a lot of quality content on those sites get buried.

I find StumbleUpon so much more friendly (as you mention in your post), with a lot of really good quality content.  I&#039;ve built up a good user base of friends and I like the &#039;network&#039; page which shows who has visited my pages, it allows me to easily connect with fellow stumblers who share similar interests.  I&#039;ve found a lot of good sites that way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree.  I&#8217;ve always been a fan of StumbleUpon.</p>
<p>I find the other social sites like Digg and Reddit cold and unfriendly, with many users just jumping on the latest hot topic or keen to see how many diggs a particular post can get, there doesn&#8217;t seem to be much social element to those sites.  I find it really difficult to connect with users on those sites.  I&#8217;ve seen a lot of quality content on those sites get buried.</p>
<p>I find StumbleUpon so much more friendly (as you mention in your post), with a lot of really good quality content.  I&#8217;ve built up a good user base of friends and I like the &#8216;network&#8217; page which shows who has visited my pages, it allows me to easily connect with fellow stumblers who share similar interests.  I&#8217;ve found a lot of good sites that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
