<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: SuperGu &#8211; the Closest Digg Clone Ever?</title> <atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/supergu-the-closest-digg-clone-ever/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://cybernetnews.com/supergu-the-closest-digg-clone-ever/</link> <description>Technology News</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:03:20 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Why The Digg Mafia Will Cost Kevin Rose Millions &#124; Connected Internet</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/supergu-the-closest-digg-clone-ever/#comment-88772</link> <dc:creator>Why The Digg Mafia Will Cost Kevin Rose Millions &#124; Connected Internet</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 11:44:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/01/12/supergu-the-closest-digg-clone-ever/#comment-88772</guid> <description>[...] but after being reminded of two recent examples I actually think that this is the case - the hacking of the SuperGu website because it was accused of being a digg clone, and the defacement of a new Yahoo site just [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] but after being reminded of two recent examples I actually think that this is the case &#8211; the hacking of the SuperGu website because it was accused of being a digg clone, and the defacement of a new Yahoo site just [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Why The Digg Mafia Will Cost Kevin Rose Millions! &#187; Techtites</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/supergu-the-closest-digg-clone-ever/#comment-88771</link> <dc:creator>Why The Digg Mafia Will Cost Kevin Rose Millions! &#187; Techtites</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 11:14:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/01/12/supergu-the-closest-digg-clone-ever/#comment-88771</guid> <description>[...] recent examples spring to my mind. Firstly there was the hacking of the SuperGu website because it was accused of being a digg clone, and secondly the defacement of a new Yahoo [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] recent examples spring to my mind. Firstly there was the hacking of the SuperGu website because it was accused of being a digg clone, and secondly the defacement of a new Yahoo [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/supergu-the-closest-digg-clone-ever/#comment-79914</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 19:23:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/01/12/supergu-the-closest-digg-clone-ever/#comment-79914</guid> <description>It seems to be downloading fast from Divshare. It&#039;s only .5MB so even if it was going slow it shouldn&#039;t take too long.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to be downloading fast from Divshare. It&#8217;s only .5MB so even if it was going slow it shouldn&#8217;t take too long.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: NinjaButterfly</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/supergu-the-closest-digg-clone-ever/#comment-79504</link> <dc:creator>NinjaButterfly</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 11:35:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/01/12/supergu-the-closest-digg-clone-ever/#comment-79504</guid> <description>Divshare is excruciatingly slow, could you upload it somewhere faster like Mediafire or Megaupload?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Divshare is excruciatingly slow, could you upload it somewhere faster like Mediafire or Megaupload?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/supergu-the-closest-digg-clone-ever/#comment-77990</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 20:16:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/01/12/supergu-the-closest-digg-clone-ever/#comment-77990</guid> <description>I am actually more of a Reddit.com fan myself, and I&#039;m surprised that someone hasn&#039;t developed a clone of that service yet.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am actually more of a Reddit.com fan myself, and I&#8217;m surprised that someone hasn&#8217;t developed a clone of that service yet.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: CoryC</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/supergu-the-closest-digg-clone-ever/#comment-77924</link> <dc:creator>CoryC</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 18:04:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/01/12/supergu-the-closest-digg-clone-ever/#comment-77924</guid> <description>The world doesn&#039;t need another Digg.  The first one is bad enough.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The world doesn&#8217;t need another Digg.  The first one is bad enough.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nate The Great</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/supergu-the-closest-digg-clone-ever/#comment-77922</link> <dc:creator>Nate The Great</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:53:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/01/12/supergu-the-closest-digg-clone-ever/#comment-77922</guid> <description>HAHAHAHA They just got hacked!http://www.supergu.com/</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HAHAHAHA They just got hacked!</p><p>[<a href='http://www.supergu.com/' rel='nofollow'>supergu.com</a>]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 259/278 objects using disk: basic

Served from: cybernetnews.com @ 2012-02-13 05:57:44 -->
