<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Take Screenshots in Firefox</title> <atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/take-screenshots-in-firefox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://cybernetnews.com/take-screenshots-in-firefox/</link> <description>Technology News</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 02:30:18 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/take-screenshots-in-firefox/#comment-121380</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 15:45:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/30/take-screenshots-in-firefox/#comment-121380</guid> <description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-121320&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Sridhar Katakam wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;To those ppl that Ryan mentions, “Some people don’t like to install applications though”, I have a question for you:Would you rather install something that works through out windows (across all the programs) or just in one app?To give another example: I don’t understand the point of mouse gesture add-ons for Firefox when one can use the excellent StrokeIt.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; Actually, there are good reasons for both of those things though. If you&#039;re only using a specific feature in your browser, then why would you get a program that will just eat away at your memory all the time? Also, you have to consider the issue of cross-platform screenshots. All of the available screenshot tools in Linux aren&#039;t very good, and this would be the first thing that I would want to use in a case like that.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-121320" rel="nofollow">Sridhar Katakam wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>To those ppl that Ryan mentions, “Some people don’t like to install applications though”, I have a question for you:</p><p>Would you rather install something that works through out windows (across all the programs) or just in one app?</p><p>To give another example: I don’t understand the point of mouse gesture add-ons for Firefox when one can use the excellent StrokeIt.</p></blockquote></div><p>Actually, there are good reasons for both of those things though. If you&#8217;re only using a specific feature in your browser, then why would you get a program that will just eat away at your memory all the time? Also, you have to consider the issue of cross-platform screenshots. All of the available screenshot tools in Linux aren&#8217;t very good, and this would be the first thing that I would want to use in a case like that.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sridhar Katakam</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/take-screenshots-in-firefox/#comment-121320</link> <dc:creator>Sridhar Katakam</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 19:18:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/30/take-screenshots-in-firefox/#comment-121320</guid> <description>To those ppl that Ryan mentions, &quot;Some people don’t like to install applications though&quot;, I have a question for you:Would you rather install something that works through out windows (across all the programs) or just in one app?To give another example: I don&#039;t understand the point of mouse gesture add-ons for Firefox when one can use the excellent StrokeIt.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To those ppl that Ryan mentions, &#8220;Some people don’t like to install applications though&#8221;, I have a question for you:</p><p>Would you rather install something that works through out windows (across all the programs) or just in one app?</p><p>To give another example: I don&#8217;t understand the point of mouse gesture add-ons for Firefox when one can use the excellent StrokeIt.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Scott</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/take-screenshots-in-firefox/#comment-121247</link> <dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 23:45:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/30/take-screenshots-in-firefox/#comment-121247</guid> <description>If you don&#039;t want to install a FF extension, http://superscreenshot.com takes a full-page screenshot of any URL you give it, with several sizing options.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you don&#8217;t want to install a FF extension, [<a href='http://superscreenshot.com' rel='nofollow'>superscreenshot.com</a>] takes a full-page screenshot of any URL you give it, with several sizing options.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/take-screenshots-in-firefox/#comment-121210</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 18:03:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/30/take-screenshots-in-firefox/#comment-121210</guid> <description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-121024&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Michele wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Consider also Pearl Crescent Page Saver Basic (263Kb). It does quite the same work but you can’t crop the screen shot. However you’ll find it at &lt;a href=&quot;http://pearlcrescent.com/products/pagesaver/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://pearlcrescent.com/products/pagesaver/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; It&#039;s nice, but no editor or annotation features as Wild pointed out.&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-121052&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Sridhar Katakam wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Yay! More bloat to my already memory hungry Firefox. How useful!? Use SnagIt or ScreenshotCaptor or Faststone Capture instead.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; Some people don&#039;t like to install applications though, and this is a great tool for providing helpful screenshots.&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-121079&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;zeepkist wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;sridhar is right, it is big; but if you are going to use something else try: MWSnap, i have tried them all and this one is the best; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mirekw.com/winfreeware/mwsnap.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.mirekw.com/winfreeware/mwsnap.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; That program is nice, but it is a bit outdated. It hasn&#039;t been updated since 2002.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-121024" rel="nofollow">Michele wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>Consider also Pearl Crescent Page Saver Basic (263Kb). It does quite the same work but you can’t crop the screen shot. However you’ll find it at [<a href='http://pearlcrescent.com/products/pagesaver/' rel='nofollow'>pearlcrescent.com</a>]</p></blockquote></div><p>It&#8217;s nice, but no editor or annotation features as Wild pointed out.</p><div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-121052" rel="nofollow">Sridhar Katakam wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>Yay! More bloat to my already memory hungry Firefox. How useful!? Use SnagIt or ScreenshotCaptor or Faststone Capture instead.</p></blockquote></div><p>Some people don&#8217;t like to install applications though, and this is a great tool for providing helpful screenshots.</p><div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-121079" rel="nofollow">zeepkist wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>sridhar is right, it is big;<br /> but if you are going to use something else try: MWSnap, i have tried them all and this one is the best;<br /> [<a href='http://www.mirekw.com/winfreeware/mwsnap.html' rel='nofollow'>mirekw.com</a>]</p></blockquote></div><p>That program is nice, but it is a bit outdated. It hasn&#8217;t been updated since 2002.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: zeepkist</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/take-screenshots-in-firefox/#comment-121079</link> <dc:creator>zeepkist</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 14:03:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/30/take-screenshots-in-firefox/#comment-121079</guid> <description>sridhar is right, it is big; but if you are going to use something else try: MWSnap, i have tried them all and this one is the best; http://www.mirekw.com/winfreeware/mwsnap.htmli have tried Fireshot and it is fast, annotation is great fun and it works very well (if you have the extra memory);it has one big limitation: it takes no screenshot if you have a card open, like Tools&gt;Options; it just sits there; pitty that;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sridhar is right, it is big;<br /> but if you are going to use something else try: MWSnap, i have tried them all and this one is the best;<br /> [<a href='http://www.mirekw.com/winfreeware/mwsnap.html' rel='nofollow'>mirekw.com</a>]</p><p>i have tried Fireshot and it is fast, annotation is great fun and it works very well (if you have the extra memory);</p><p>it has one big limitation:<br /> it takes no screenshot if you have a card open, like Tools&gt;Options;<br /> it just sits there; pitty that;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Fireshot, capturas avanzadas en Firefox</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/take-screenshots-in-firefox/#comment-121061</link> <dc:creator>Fireshot, capturas avanzadas en Firefox</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 12:16:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/30/take-screenshots-in-firefox/#comment-121061</guid> <description>[...] Demostración de uso. Descarga: Fireshot 0.16. Web oficial: Mozilla Addons. Visto en CyberNetNews.   Tags: extensiones, Firefox, imagenesOtras entradas que te pueden interesar...:Las mejores [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Demostración de uso. Descarga: Fireshot 0.16. Web oficial: Mozilla Addons. Visto en CyberNetNews.   Tags: extensiones, Firefox, imagenesOtras entradas que te pueden interesar&#8230;:Las mejores [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sridhar Katakam</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/take-screenshots-in-firefox/#comment-121052</link> <dc:creator>Sridhar Katakam</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 10:59:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/30/take-screenshots-in-firefox/#comment-121052</guid> <description>Yay! More bloat to my already memory hungry Firefox. How useful!? Use SnagIt or ScreenshotCaptor or Faststone Capture instead.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yay! More bloat to my already memory hungry Firefox. How useful!? Use SnagIt or ScreenshotCaptor or Faststone Capture instead.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/take-screenshots-in-firefox/#comment-121043</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 06:18:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/30/take-screenshots-in-firefox/#comment-121043</guid> <description>the same: only capturing</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the same: only capturing</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/take-screenshots-in-firefox/#comment-121030</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 03:08:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/30/take-screenshots-in-firefox/#comment-121030</guid> <description>What about ScreenGrab extension ?? http://www.screengrab.org/</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about ScreenGrab extension ??<br /> [<a href='http://www.screengrab.org/' rel='nofollow'>screengrab.org</a>]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Wild</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/take-screenshots-in-firefox/#comment-121028</link> <dc:creator>Wild</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 02:37:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/30/take-screenshots-in-firefox/#comment-121028</guid> <description>Page Saver doesn&#039;t offer an annotation editor. It&#039;s just for page capturing.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Page Saver doesn&#8217;t offer an annotation editor. It&#8217;s just for page capturing.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 298/319 objects using disk: basic

Served from: cybernetnews.com @ 2012-05-27 09:44:15 -->
