<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Take Screenshots in Firefox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/take-screenshots-in-firefox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/take-screenshots-in-firefox/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 20:26:55 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/take-screenshots-in-firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-121380</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 15:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/30/take-screenshots-in-firefox/#comment-121380</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-121320&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Sridhar Katakam wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;To those ppl that Ryan mentions, “Some people don’t like to install applications though”, I have a question for you:

Would you rather install something that works through out windows (across all the programs) or just in one app? 

To give another example: I don’t understand the point of mouse gesture add-ons for Firefox when one can use the excellent StrokeIt.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
Actually, there are good reasons for both of those things though. If you&#039;re only using a specific feature in your browser, then why would you get a program that will just eat away at your memory all the time? Also, you have to consider the issue of cross-platform screenshots. All of the available screenshot tools in Linux aren&#039;t very good, and this would be the first thing that I would want to use in a case like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-121320" rel="nofollow">Sridhar Katakam wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>To those ppl that Ryan mentions, “Some people don’t like to install applications though”, I have a question for you:</p>
<p>Would you rather install something that works through out windows (across all the programs) or just in one app? </p>
<p>To give another example: I don’t understand the point of mouse gesture add-ons for Firefox when one can use the excellent StrokeIt.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Actually, there are good reasons for both of those things though. If you&#8217;re only using a specific feature in your browser, then why would you get a program that will just eat away at your memory all the time? Also, you have to consider the issue of cross-platform screenshots. All of the available screenshot tools in Linux aren&#8217;t very good, and this would be the first thing that I would want to use in a case like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sridhar Katakam</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/take-screenshots-in-firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-121320</link>
		<dc:creator>Sridhar Katakam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 19:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/30/take-screenshots-in-firefox/#comment-121320</guid>
		<description>To those ppl that Ryan mentions, &quot;Some people don’t like to install applications though&quot;, I have a question for you:

Would you rather install something that works through out windows (across all the programs) or just in one app? 

To give another example: I don&#039;t understand the point of mouse gesture add-ons for Firefox when one can use the excellent StrokeIt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To those ppl that Ryan mentions, &#8220;Some people don’t like to install applications though&#8221;, I have a question for you:</p>
<p>Would you rather install something that works through out windows (across all the programs) or just in one app? </p>
<p>To give another example: I don&#8217;t understand the point of mouse gesture add-ons for Firefox when one can use the excellent StrokeIt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/take-screenshots-in-firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-121247</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 23:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/30/take-screenshots-in-firefox/#comment-121247</guid>
		<description>If you don&#039;t want to install a FF extension, http://superscreenshot.com takes a full-page screenshot of any URL you give it, with several sizing options.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you don&#8217;t want to install a FF extension, [<a href='http://superscreenshot.com' rel='nofollow'>superscreenshot.com</a>] takes a full-page screenshot of any URL you give it, with several sizing options.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/take-screenshots-in-firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-121210</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 18:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/30/take-screenshots-in-firefox/#comment-121210</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-121024&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Michele wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Consider also Pearl Crescent Page Saver Basic (263Kb). It does quite the same work but you can’t crop the screen shot. However you’ll find it at &lt;a href=&quot;http://pearlcrescent.com/products/pagesaver/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://pearlcrescent.com/products/pagesaver/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
It&#039;s nice, but no editor or annotation features as Wild pointed out.

&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-121052&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Sridhar Katakam wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Yay! More bloat to my already memory hungry Firefox. How useful!? Use SnagIt or ScreenshotCaptor or Faststone Capture instead.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
Some people don&#039;t like to install applications though, and this is a great tool for providing helpful screenshots.

&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-121079&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;zeepkist wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;sridhar is right, it is big;
but if you are going to use something else try: MWSnap, i have tried them all and this one is the best;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mirekw.com/winfreeware/mwsnap.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.mirekw.com/winfreeware/mwsnap.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
That program is nice, but it is a bit outdated. It hasn&#039;t been updated since 2002.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-121024" rel="nofollow">Michele wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>Consider also Pearl Crescent Page Saver Basic (263Kb). It does quite the same work but you can’t crop the screen shot. However you’ll find it at [<a href='http://pearlcrescent.com/products/pagesaver/' rel='nofollow'>pearlcrescent.com</a>]</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>It&#8217;s nice, but no editor or annotation features as Wild pointed out.</p>
<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-121052" rel="nofollow">Sridhar Katakam wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>Yay! More bloat to my already memory hungry Firefox. How useful!? Use SnagIt or ScreenshotCaptor or Faststone Capture instead.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Some people don&#8217;t like to install applications though, and this is a great tool for providing helpful screenshots.</p>
<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-121079" rel="nofollow">zeepkist wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>sridhar is right, it is big;<br />
but if you are going to use something else try: MWSnap, i have tried them all and this one is the best;<br />
[<a href='http://www.mirekw.com/winfreeware/mwsnap.html' rel='nofollow'>mirekw.com</a>]</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>That program is nice, but it is a bit outdated. It hasn&#8217;t been updated since 2002.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zeepkist</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/take-screenshots-in-firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-121079</link>
		<dc:creator>zeepkist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 14:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/30/take-screenshots-in-firefox/#comment-121079</guid>
		<description>sridhar is right, it is big; 
but if you are going to use something else try: MWSnap, i have tried them all and this one is the best;
http://www.mirekw.com/winfreeware/mwsnap.html

i have tried Fireshot and it is fast, annotation is great fun and it works very well (if you have the extra memory);

it has one big limitation:
it takes no screenshot if you have a card open, like Tools&gt;Options; 
it just sits there; pitty that;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sridhar is right, it is big;<br />
but if you are going to use something else try: MWSnap, i have tried them all and this one is the best;<br />
[<a href='http://www.mirekw.com/winfreeware/mwsnap.html' rel='nofollow'>mirekw.com</a>]</p>
<p>i have tried Fireshot and it is fast, annotation is great fun and it works very well (if you have the extra memory);</p>
<p>it has one big limitation:<br />
it takes no screenshot if you have a card open, like Tools&gt;Options;<br />
it just sits there; pitty that;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fireshot, capturas avanzadas en Firefox</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/take-screenshots-in-firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-121061</link>
		<dc:creator>Fireshot, capturas avanzadas en Firefox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 12:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/30/take-screenshots-in-firefox/#comment-121061</guid>
		<description>[...] Demostración de uso. Descarga: Fireshot 0.16. Web oficial: Mozilla Addons. Visto en CyberNetNews.   Tags: extensiones, Firefox, imagenesOtras entradas que te pueden interesar...:Las mejores [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Demostración de uso. Descarga: Fireshot 0.16. Web oficial: Mozilla Addons. Visto en CyberNetNews.   Tags: extensiones, Firefox, imagenesOtras entradas que te pueden interesar&#8230;:Las mejores [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sridhar Katakam</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/take-screenshots-in-firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-121052</link>
		<dc:creator>Sridhar Katakam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 10:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/30/take-screenshots-in-firefox/#comment-121052</guid>
		<description>Yay! More bloat to my already memory hungry Firefox. How useful!? Use SnagIt or ScreenshotCaptor or Faststone Capture instead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yay! More bloat to my already memory hungry Firefox. How useful!? Use SnagIt or ScreenshotCaptor or Faststone Capture instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/take-screenshots-in-firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-121043</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 06:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/30/take-screenshots-in-firefox/#comment-121043</guid>
		<description>the same: only capturing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the same: only capturing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/take-screenshots-in-firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-121030</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 03:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/30/take-screenshots-in-firefox/#comment-121030</guid>
		<description>What about ScreenGrab extension ??
http://www.screengrab.org/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about ScreenGrab extension ??<br />
[<a href='http://www.screengrab.org/' rel='nofollow'>screengrab.org</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wild</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/take-screenshots-in-firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-121028</link>
		<dc:creator>Wild</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 02:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/30/take-screenshots-in-firefox/#comment-121028</guid>
		<description>Page Saver doesn&#039;t offer an annotation editor. It&#039;s just for page capturing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Page Saver doesn&#8217;t offer an annotation editor. It&#8217;s just for page capturing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
