<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: That Firefox 3 Bug &quot;Rumor&quot;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/that-firefox-3-bug-rumor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/that-firefox-3-bug-rumor/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:53:50 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/that-firefox-3-bug-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-123382</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 16:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/16/that-firefox-3-bug-rumor/#comment-123382</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-123364&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;s427 wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Tristan Nitot (president of Mozilla Europe) wrote an interesting article about those “bugs”. Bottom line : when you hear a developer talking about “bugs”, he might be talking about features, changes or tweaks to the program. Not necessarily the nasty and potentially dangerous bugs everyone thinks about. Read it here : 

&lt;a href=&quot;http://standblog.org/blog/post/2007/11/21/When-a-but-is-actually-not-a-bug&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://standblog.org/blog/post.....-not-a-bug&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
That&#039;s a good point, as a developer myself I know I have done the same thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-123364" rel="nofollow">s427 wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>Tristan Nitot (president of Mozilla Europe) wrote an interesting article about those “bugs”. Bottom line : when you hear a developer talking about “bugs”, he might be talking about features, changes or tweaks to the program. Not necessarily the nasty and potentially dangerous bugs everyone thinks about. Read it here : </p>
<p>[<a href='http://standblog.org/blog/post/2007/11/21/When-a-but-is-actually-not-a-bug' rel='nofollow'>standblog.org</a>]</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>That&#8217;s a good point, as a developer myself I know I have done the same thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: s427</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/that-firefox-3-bug-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-123364</link>
		<dc:creator>s427</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 15:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/16/that-firefox-3-bug-rumor/#comment-123364</guid>
		<description>Tristan Nitot (president of Mozilla Europe) wrote an interesting article about those &quot;bugs&quot;. Bottom line : when you hear a developer talking about &quot;bugs&quot;, he might be talking about features, changes or tweaks to the program. Not necessarily the nasty and potentially dangerous bugs everyone thinks about. Read it here : 

http://standblog.org/blog/post/2007/11/21/When-a-but-is-actually-not-a-bug</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tristan Nitot (president of Mozilla Europe) wrote an interesting article about those &#8220;bugs&#8221;. Bottom line : when you hear a developer talking about &#8220;bugs&#8221;, he might be talking about features, changes or tweaks to the program. Not necessarily the nasty and potentially dangerous bugs everyone thinks about. Read it here : </p>
<p>[<a href='http://standblog.org/blog/post/2007/11/21/When-a-but-is-actually-not-a-bug' rel='nofollow'>standblog.org</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FireFox 3.0 Beta Released &#187; Jeffro2pt0.com</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/that-firefox-3-bug-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-123288</link>
		<dc:creator>FireFox 3.0 Beta Released &#187; Jeffro2pt0.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 23:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/16/that-firefox-3-bug-rumor/#comment-123288</guid>
		<description>[...] It’s available in 21 different languages for Windows, Mac, and Linux. This version still has hundreds of bugs in it. Asa Dotzler, Mozilla’s Quality Assurance leader, did say that it is the “most thoroughly [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It’s available in 21 different languages for Windows, Mac, and Linux. This version still has hundreds of bugs in it. Asa Dotzler, Mozilla’s Quality Assurance leader, did say that it is the “most thoroughly [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/that-firefox-3-bug-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-122954</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 21:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/16/that-firefox-3-bug-rumor/#comment-122954</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-122915&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Google wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;How many bugs does IE have?&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
There are probably a large amount of bugs in IE, but that was one of the things that I tried to stress in the article. When programs are not open source it is much easier for the community to criticize the progress, because they see it along every step of the way.

&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-122919&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;James wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;A lot of the regular testers believe the earliest Firefox 3.0 will be released is close to say March so it is not like they have only a couple weeks to fix all some 700 so called blockers.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
Especially that the browser is essentially feature complete by this point. From now on out the focus is performance, bugs, and tidying up the existing features.

&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-122944&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Cody wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;I would never return to IE after Firefox. Still I’m almost certain IE has less bugs than Firefox. 

The only reason I stay with Firefox is the speed and the use of extensions.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
I&#039;m skeptical of IE having less bugs than Firefox, especially after launching a completely redesigned browser the last time around. Big changes mean lots of bugs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-122915" rel="nofollow">Google wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>How many bugs does IE have?</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>There are probably a large amount of bugs in IE, but that was one of the things that I tried to stress in the article. When programs are not open source it is much easier for the community to criticize the progress, because they see it along every step of the way.</p>
<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-122919" rel="nofollow">James wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>A lot of the regular testers believe the earliest Firefox 3.0 will be released is close to say March so it is not like they have only a couple weeks to fix all some 700 so called blockers.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Especially that the browser is essentially feature complete by this point. From now on out the focus is performance, bugs, and tidying up the existing features.</p>
<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-122944" rel="nofollow">Cody wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>I would never return to IE after Firefox. Still I’m almost certain IE has less bugs than Firefox. </p>
<p>The only reason I stay with Firefox is the speed and the use of extensions.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>I&#8217;m skeptical of IE having less bugs than Firefox, especially after launching a completely redesigned browser the last time around. Big changes mean lots of bugs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cody</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/that-firefox-3-bug-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-122944</link>
		<dc:creator>Cody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 18:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/16/that-firefox-3-bug-rumor/#comment-122944</guid>
		<description>I would never return to IE after Firefox. Still I&#039;m almost certain IE has less bugs than Firefox. 

The only reason I stay with Firefox is the speed and the use of extensions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would never return to IE after Firefox. Still I&#8217;m almost certain IE has less bugs than Firefox. </p>
<p>The only reason I stay with Firefox is the speed and the use of extensions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/that-firefox-3-bug-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-122919</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 06:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/16/that-firefox-3-bug-rumor/#comment-122919</guid>
		<description>Some people do not believe that there has been that many bug fixes behind the development of Firefox 3.0 already as because they are not willing to see for themselves or do not realize that Firefox 3.0 was already being worked on for sometime now while still on the Trunk (at least 15+ months). A lot of the regular testers believe the earliest Firefox 3.0 will be released is close to say March so it is not like they have only a couple weeks to fix all some 700 so called blockers. The devs are not the only ones that can fix the bugs as people who are familiar with certain parts and such can help submit patches that can be used or to get the ball rolling for a proper patch.


&quot;&quot;How many bugs does IE have?&quot;&quot;
 A few million give or take 100,1000 ...J/K ..MS does have the extra hurdle with IE being part of the OS though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some people do not believe that there has been that many bug fixes behind the development of Firefox 3.0 already as because they are not willing to see for themselves or do not realize that Firefox 3.0 was already being worked on for sometime now while still on the Trunk (at least 15+ months). A lot of the regular testers believe the earliest Firefox 3.0 will be released is close to say March so it is not like they have only a couple weeks to fix all some 700 so called blockers. The devs are not the only ones that can fix the bugs as people who are familiar with certain parts and such can help submit patches that can be used or to get the ball rolling for a proper patch.</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8221;How many bugs does IE have?&#8221;"<br />
 A few million give or take 100,1000 &#8230;J/K ..MS does have the extra hurdle with IE being part of the OS though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/that-firefox-3-bug-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-122915</link>
		<dc:creator>Google</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 03:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/16/that-firefox-3-bug-rumor/#comment-122915</guid>
		<description>How many bugs does IE have?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many bugs does IE have?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. E.</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/that-firefox-3-bug-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-122906</link>
		<dc:creator>M. E.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 01:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/16/that-firefox-3-bug-rumor/#comment-122906</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-122891&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;TiKoZ wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;lol they’re kidding right? they expect people to just be okay with dealing with a buggy browser just because “it’s not IE” ? Mozilla is definitely on the wrong way here!
And hey what did they do with all the Google money?! print those cool “spread firefox” tshirts :S ?&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

Read this:

The Quality Assurance leader, Asa Dotzler, called Keizer’s claim “simply horseshit.” He said that they have “already fixed over 11,000 bugs and features in Firefox 3 and now we’re discussing how to handle the remaining 700 issues.“</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-122891" rel="nofollow">TiKoZ wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>lol they’re kidding right? they expect people to just be okay with dealing with a buggy browser just because “it’s not IE” ? Mozilla is definitely on the wrong way here!<br />
And hey what did they do with all the Google money?! print those cool “spread firefox” tshirts :S ?</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Read this:</p>
<p>The Quality Assurance leader, Asa Dotzler, called Keizer’s claim “simply horseshit.” He said that they have “already fixed over 11,000 bugs and features in Firefox 3 and now we’re discussing how to handle the remaining 700 issues.“</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TiKoZ</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/that-firefox-3-bug-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-122891</link>
		<dc:creator>TiKoZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 23:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/16/that-firefox-3-bug-rumor/#comment-122891</guid>
		<description>lol they&#039;re kidding right? they expect people to just be okay with dealing with a buggy browser just because &quot;it&#039;s not IE&quot; ? Mozilla is definitely on the wrong way here!
And hey what did they do with all the Google money?! print those cool &quot;spread firefox&quot; tshirts :S ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol they&#8217;re kidding right? they expect people to just be okay with dealing with a buggy browser just because &#8220;it&#8217;s not IE&#8221; ? Mozilla is definitely on the wrong way here!<br />
And hey what did they do with all the Google money?! print those cool &#8220;spread firefox&#8221; tshirts :S ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
