<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Google Blog Is Back&#8230;With An Explanation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/the-google-blog-is-backwith-an-explanation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/the-google-blog-is-backwith-an-explanation/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 20:26:55 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/the-google-blog-is-backwith-an-explanation/comment-page-1/#comment-898</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 18:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cybernetnews.com/?p=434#comment-898</guid>
		<description>I was thinking that also, but if it was really hacked I would have thought the individual would have added something to the existing site instead of deleting the blog all together. We may never know though.

-Ryan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was thinking that also, but if it was really hacked I would have thought the individual would have added something to the existing site instead of deleting the blog all together. We may never know though.</p>
<p>-Ryan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ajay D'Souza</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/the-google-blog-is-backwith-an-explanation/comment-page-1/#comment-894</link>
		<dc:creator>Ajay D'Souza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 16:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cybernetnews.com/?p=434#comment-894</guid>
		<description>Not going to oppose what Google says, but couldn&#039;t it just be a good tactic to deny the fact that they were hacked?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not going to oppose what Google says, but couldn&#8217;t it just be a good tactic to deny the fact that they were hacked?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
