<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Official Firefox 2 Beta 1 Will Not Be Released Today</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/the-official-firefox-2-beta-1-will-not-be-released-today/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/the-official-firefox-2-beta-1-will-not-be-released-today/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:19:52 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/the-official-firefox-2-beta-1-will-not-be-released-today/comment-page-1/#comment-6259</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 15:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/07/10/the-official-firefox-2-beta-1-will-not-be-released-today/#comment-6259</guid>
		<description>Yes, there is already a third release candidate. I have posted the &lt;a href=&quot;http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/07/11/download-firefox-20-beta-1-release-candidate-3/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;download links&lt;/a&gt; and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/07/11/portable-firefox-20-beta-1-release-candidate-3/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;portable version&lt;/a&gt; already.

-Ryan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, there is already a third release candidate. I have posted the [<a href='http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/07/11/download-firefox-20-beta-1-release-candidate-3/' rel='nofollow'>tech.cybernetnews.com</a>] and the [<a href='http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/07/11/portable-firefox-20-beta-1-release-candidate-3/' rel='nofollow'>tech.cybernetnews.com</a>] already.</p>
<p>-Ryan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/the-official-firefox-2-beta-1-will-not-be-released-today/comment-page-1/#comment-6256</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 15:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/07/10/the-official-firefox-2-beta-1-will-not-be-released-today/#comment-6256</guid>
		<description>Releasing v. 2.0 when Firefox is still unable to print any moderately complex two-pager is absolutely insane. Someday somone WILL notice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Releasing v. 2.0 when Firefox is still unable to print any moderately complex two-pager is absolutely insane. Someday somone WILL notice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: natmaster</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/the-official-firefox-2-beta-1-will-not-be-released-today/comment-page-1/#comment-6253</link>
		<dc:creator>natmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 14:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/07/10/the-official-firefox-2-beta-1-will-not-be-released-today/#comment-6253</guid>
		<description>According to the Google Group, Mozilla has now released a third RC for this beta.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the Google Group, Mozilla has now released a third RC for this beta.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
