<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The OLPC Laptops Will Come Loaded With Wikipedia Articles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/the-olpc-laptops-will-come-loaded-with-wikipedia-articles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/the-olpc-laptops-will-come-loaded-with-wikipedia-articles/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:19:52 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: webwhiz</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/the-olpc-laptops-will-come-loaded-with-wikipedia-articles/comment-page-1/#comment-10143</link>
		<dc:creator>webwhiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 16:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/08/04/the-olpc-laptops-will-come-loaded-with-wikipedia-articles/#comment-10143</guid>
		<description>Well, wikipedia is definitely revolutionizing the way we access information online.  However, can we honestly say that the content provided by Wikipedia maintains accuracy and integrity.  Really, there are many people from accross the world that have access to edit and change content online. In light of that, is there a way of differentiating fact from fiction. In essence, is wikipedia a trustable source.

Please read my article if you want to know more: http://www.askdrweb.com/2006/08/14/wikipedia-–-is-it-a-trustable-source-for-accurate-content/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, wikipedia is definitely revolutionizing the way we access information online.  However, can we honestly say that the content provided by Wikipedia maintains accuracy and integrity.  Really, there are many people from accross the world that have access to edit and change content online. In light of that, is there a way of differentiating fact from fiction. In essence, is wikipedia a trustable source.</p>
<p>Please read my article if you want to know more: [<a href='http://www.askdrweb.com/2006/08/14/wikipedia-' rel='nofollow'>askdrweb.com</a>]–-is-it-a-trustable-source-for-accurate-content/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webwhiz</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/the-olpc-laptops-will-come-loaded-with-wikipedia-articles/comment-page-1/#comment-10142</link>
		<dc:creator>webwhiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 16:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/08/04/the-olpc-laptops-will-come-loaded-with-wikipedia-articles/#comment-10142</guid>
		<description>Its seems rather worrisome that we all are fascinated by the user contributed content in Wikipedia.  Yet, we do not question the integrity or accuracy of the content. Really, there is a certain amount of factual information there.  However, can it be considered an academic resource.

Please see below an article that deals with this issue on my website. Just thought that it would be relevant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its seems rather worrisome that we all are fascinated by the user contributed content in Wikipedia.  Yet, we do not question the integrity or accuracy of the content. Really, there is a certain amount of factual information there.  However, can it be considered an academic resource.</p>
<p>Please see below an article that deals with this issue on my website. Just thought that it would be relevant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
