Comments on: The Visual Identity of Firefox…What’s Right & What’s Wrong http://cybernetnews.com/the-visual-identify-of-firefoxwhats-right-whats-wrong/ Technology News Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:40:50 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Ryanhttp://cybernetnews.com/the-visual-identify-of-firefoxwhats-right-whats-wrong/#comment-95515 Ryan Wed, 09 May 2007 15:54:00 +0000 http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/01/02/the-visual-identify-of-firefoxwhats-right-whats-wrong/#comment-95515 I thought I had used the Title tag but it appears you are right. I went ahead and switched it out so it should work fine now. Thanks for bringing that to my attention. I thought I had used the Title tag but it appears you are right. I went ahead and switched it out so it should work fine now. Thanks for bringing that to my attention.

]]> By: spoofhttp://cybernetnews.com/the-visual-identify-of-firefoxwhats-right-whats-wrong/#comment-95505 spoof Wed, 09 May 2007 11:07:43 +0000 http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/01/02/the-visual-identify-of-firefoxwhats-right-whats-wrong/#comment-95505 Great! Now we know how to spot the spoofs! ;-)Anyway I just thought I'd point out that hovering your mouse over an image and making an explanatory text show up is not made through standard by the "alt" tag. The alt tag is for when an image fails to load for whatever reason. The correct usage is the "title" tag, which is what browsers need which do not compromise the standard.Sincerely, spoof Great! Now we know how to spot the spoofs! ;-)

Anyway I just thought I’d point out that hovering your mouse over an image and making an explanatory text show up is not made through standard by the “alt” tag. The alt tag is for when an image fails to load for whatever reason. The correct usage is the “title” tag, which is what browsers need which do not compromise the standard.

Sincerely,
spoof

]]> By: Ryanhttp://cybernetnews.com/the-visual-identify-of-firefoxwhats-right-whats-wrong/#comment-68046 Ryan Tue, 02 Jan 2007 20:32:44 +0000 http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/01/02/the-visual-identify-of-firefoxwhats-right-whats-wrong/#comment-68046 Man, we are normally pretty good about catching mistakes when we proofread...but it looks like one slipped through the cracks. :( Man, we are normally pretty good about catching mistakes when we proofread…but it looks like one slipped through the cracks. :(

]]> By: Chad-)http://cybernetnews.com/the-visual-identify-of-firefoxwhats-right-whats-wrong/#comment-68035 Chad-) Tue, 02 Jan 2007 20:09:51 +0000 http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/01/02/the-visual-identify-of-firefoxwhats-right-whats-wrong/#comment-68035 :roll: such precise proportions!!! <blockquote>The Visual <strong>Identify</strong> of Firefox…What’s Right & What’s Wrong</blockquote> Just saw <a href="http://grammarhell.com/blog1/2007/01/01/are-spelling-lessons-tax-deductible/">Grammar Hell</a> taking Gizmodo to task for a spelling mistake ;) :roll: such precise proportions!!!

The Visual Identify of Firefox…What’s Right & What’s Wrong

Just saw [grammarhell.com] taking Gizmodo to task for a spelling mistake ;)

]]> By: Ryanhttp://cybernetnews.com/the-visual-identify-of-firefoxwhats-right-whats-wrong/#comment-67998 Ryan Tue, 02 Jan 2007 19:26:12 +0000 http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/01/02/the-visual-identify-of-firefoxwhats-right-whats-wrong/#comment-67998 Well, I don't think they will really attack someone that portrays their logo incorrectly, but to keep things official they need to have some guidelines. That way if someone whips up a fake logo and claim it to be official...Mozilla can come back and say why it is not accurate. Well, I don’t think they will really attack someone that portrays their logo incorrectly, but to keep things official they need to have some guidelines. That way if someone whips up a fake logo and claim it to be official…Mozilla can come back and say why it is not accurate.

]]> By: Lewishttp://cybernetnews.com/the-visual-identify-of-firefoxwhats-right-whats-wrong/#comment-67979 Lewis Tue, 02 Jan 2007 18:11:39 +0000 http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/01/02/the-visual-identify-of-firefoxwhats-right-whats-wrong/#comment-67979 Wow, that's kind of... stupid. I understand protecting their trademark, but is it really needed to be so strict? Wow, that’s kind of… stupid. I understand protecting their trademark, but is it really needed to be so strict?

]]>