<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: VeriSign&#8217;s iDefense Paying Big Bucks For Vista and IE 7 Bugs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/verisigns-idefense-paying-big-bucks-for-vista-and-ie-7-bugs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/verisigns-idefense-paying-big-bucks-for-vista-and-ie-7-bugs/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:45:09 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/verisigns-idefense-paying-big-bucks-for-vista-and-ie-7-bugs/comment-page-1/#comment-77272</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 22:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/01/11/verisigns-idefense-paying-big-bucks-for-vista-and-ie-7-bugs/#comment-77272</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure a few hundred dollars is a lot of motivation, but when we&#039;re talking several thousand that takes motivation to a whole new level. That is about the stage that greed enters in and people feel obligated to be the first ones to find the exploits and be among the select few who could actually say &quot;I broke Windows and got paid well to do it!&quot; This is probably going as far as to tempt Kevin Mitnick (world renowned hacker that now runs a security firm) to bust out the old-school hacking tricks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure a few hundred dollars is a lot of motivation, but when we&#8217;re talking several thousand that takes motivation to a whole new level. That is about the stage that greed enters in and people feel obligated to be the first ones to find the exploits and be among the select few who could actually say &#8220;I broke Windows and got paid well to do it!&#8221; This is probably going as far as to tempt Kevin Mitnick (world renowned hacker that now runs a security firm) to bust out the old-school hacking tricks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CoryC</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/verisigns-idefense-paying-big-bucks-for-vista-and-ie-7-bugs/comment-page-1/#comment-77266</link>
		<dc:creator>CoryC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 21:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/01/11/verisigns-idefense-paying-big-bucks-for-vista-and-ie-7-bugs/#comment-77266</guid>
		<description>&lt;div id=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-77257&quot;&gt;Ryan wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;I know that Microsoft normally holds conventions to try and present security exploits, but I don&#039;t think that is enough. They should have better prepared Vista by holding contests similar to this and to try and draw the fatal flaws out before it was even released...which would surely help make it the securest version of Windows yet.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

They did, sort of.  They did offer their developers a couple hundred bucks per bug found for a short time.  The developers were suppose to find these bugs while not at work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-77257">Ryan wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>I know that Microsoft normally holds conventions to try and present security exploits, but I don&#8217;t think that is enough. They should have better prepared Vista by holding contests similar to this and to try and draw the fatal flaws out before it was even released&#8230;which would surely help make it the securest version of Windows yet.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>They did, sort of.  They did offer their developers a couple hundred bucks per bug found for a short time.  The developers were suppose to find these bugs while not at work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/verisigns-idefense-paying-big-bucks-for-vista-and-ie-7-bugs/comment-page-1/#comment-77257</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 21:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/01/11/verisigns-idefense-paying-big-bucks-for-vista-and-ie-7-bugs/#comment-77257</guid>
		<description>I know that Microsoft normally holds conventions to try and present security exploits, but I don&#039;t think that is enough. They should have better prepared Vista by holding contests similar to this and to try and draw the fatal flaws out before it was even released...which would surely help make it the securest version of Windows yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know that Microsoft normally holds conventions to try and present security exploits, but I don&#8217;t think that is enough. They should have better prepared Vista by holding contests similar to this and to try and draw the fatal flaws out before it was even released&#8230;which would surely help make it the securest version of Windows yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CoryC</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/verisigns-idefense-paying-big-bucks-for-vista-and-ie-7-bugs/comment-page-1/#comment-77021</link>
		<dc:creator>CoryC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/01/11/verisigns-idefense-paying-big-bucks-for-vista-and-ie-7-bugs/#comment-77021</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Thereâ€™s no need for Microsoft to pay when others are willing to fork out money and do the work on their behalf!&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Now, one has to ask, &quot;Is this smart business or is Microsoft being short-sighted?&quot;

I understand MS doesn&#039;t want to encourage the bad guys to find/publish exploits but they are going to do it any way. Microsoft should provide an incentive to researchers (honest ones) to help find exploits before the dishonest (blackhat hackers) do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Thereâ€™s no need for Microsoft to pay when others are willing to fork out money and do the work on their behalf!</p></blockquote>
<p>Now, one has to ask, &#8220;Is this smart business or is Microsoft being short-sighted?&#8221;</p>
<p>I understand MS doesn&#8217;t want to encourage the bad guys to find/publish exploits but they are going to do it any way. Microsoft should provide an incentive to researchers (honest ones) to help find exploits before the dishonest (blackhat hackers) do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CoryC</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/verisigns-idefense-paying-big-bucks-for-vista-and-ie-7-bugs/comment-page-1/#comment-77011</link>
		<dc:creator>CoryC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/01/11/verisigns-idefense-paying-big-bucks-for-vista-and-ie-7-bugs/#comment-77011</guid>
		<description>&lt;div id=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-76984&quot;&gt;Lewis wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;I don&#039;t understand how VeriSign benefit except for image-wise.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

An unsafe web is bad for business.  If people felt that e-commerce was not safe they would not shop online.  If no one is shopping online they VeriSign would sell fewer SSL certificates.  Of course, VeriSign does more then sell SSL certificates but the idea is the same; an unsafe web is bad for business and buggy MS software endangers web surfers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-76984">Lewis wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>I don&#8217;t understand how VeriSign benefit except for image-wise.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>An unsafe web is bad for business.  If people felt that e-commerce was not safe they would not shop online.  If no one is shopping online they VeriSign would sell fewer SSL certificates.  Of course, VeriSign does more then sell SSL certificates but the idea is the same; an unsafe web is bad for business and buggy MS software endangers web surfers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lewis</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/verisigns-idefense-paying-big-bucks-for-vista-and-ie-7-bugs/comment-page-1/#comment-76984</link>
		<dc:creator>Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/01/11/verisigns-idefense-paying-big-bucks-for-vista-and-ie-7-bugs/#comment-76984</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand how VeriSign benefit except for image-wise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand how VeriSign benefit except for image-wise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
