Comments on: Version 3.2 of Paint.NET Pushed Out the Door http://cybernetnews.com/version-32-of-paintnet-pushed-out-the-door/ Technology News Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:40:50 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Ryanhttp://cybernetnews.com/version-32-of-paintnet-pushed-out-the-door/#comment-126700 Ryan Sat, 15 Dec 2007 19:30:32 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/2007/12/13/version-32-of-paintnet-pushed-out-the-door/#comment-126700 <div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-126529" rel="nofollow">Michael Dobrofsky wrote:</a><blockquote>The download is only 1.6Mb? That is insane. I know they use .Net, but still, that is some streamlined code.</blockquote></div> That is the result of hard work from the developer, and I'm sure that is also part of the reason why it runs so darn fast. On my computer it is able to startup in a matter of seconds. Michael Dobrofsky wrote:
The download is only 1.6Mb? That is insane. I know they use .Net, but still, that is some streamlined code.

That is the result of hard work from the developer, and I’m sure that is also part of the reason why it runs so darn fast. On my computer it is able to startup in a matter of seconds.

]]> By: Ashleyhttp://cybernetnews.com/version-32-of-paintnet-pushed-out-the-door/#comment-126696 Ashley Sat, 15 Dec 2007 19:25:49 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/2007/12/13/version-32-of-paintnet-pushed-out-the-door/#comment-126696 <div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-126524" rel="nofollow">Amak wrote:</a><blockquote>I have always wanted to know: is this a viable replacement for Photoshop? In fact, it actually appears it may be superior :|</blockquote></div> It's definitely not superior because it's still lacking a ton of things that Photoshop offers, but for most people, it is a viable replacement. It's easier to understand, easier to use, and it offers most of the features that the typical person would need. I prefer it to Photoshop, simply because does everything I need it to do. Amak wrote:
I have always wanted to know: is this a viable replacement for Photoshop? In fact, it actually appears it may be superior :|

It’s definitely not superior because it’s still lacking a ton of things that Photoshop offers, but for most people, it is a viable replacement. It’s easier to understand, easier to use, and it offers most of the features that the typical person would need. I prefer it to Photoshop, simply because does everything I need it to do.

]]> By: Perliukai #416 : nežinau.lthttp://cybernetnews.com/version-32-of-paintnet-pushed-out-the-door/#comment-126661 Perliukai #416 : nežinau.lt Sat, 15 Dec 2007 14:00:48 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/2007/12/13/version-32-of-paintnet-pushed-out-the-door/#comment-126661 [...] savait? pasirod? nauja Paint.Net versija 3.2. Joje patobulinta sta?iakampi? žym?jimo funkcija, efektai, daugyb? kit? nauj? dalyk?. Visas [...] [...] savait? pasirod? nauja Paint.Net versija 3.2. Joje patobulinta sta?iakampi? žym?jimo funkcija, efektai, daugyb? kit? nauj? dalyk?. Visas [...]

]]> By: Michael Dobrofskyhttp://cybernetnews.com/version-32-of-paintnet-pushed-out-the-door/#comment-126529 Michael Dobrofsky Fri, 14 Dec 2007 00:05:00 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/2007/12/13/version-32-of-paintnet-pushed-out-the-door/#comment-126529 The download is only 1.6Mb? That is insane. I know they use .Net, but still, that is some streamlined code. The download is only 1.6Mb? That is insane. I know they use .Net, but still, that is some streamlined code.

]]> By: Amakhttp://cybernetnews.com/version-32-of-paintnet-pushed-out-the-door/#comment-126524 Amak Thu, 13 Dec 2007 23:13:36 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/2007/12/13/version-32-of-paintnet-pushed-out-the-door/#comment-126524 I have always wanted to know: is this a viable replacement for Photoshop? In fact, it actually appears it may be superior :| I have always wanted to know: is this a viable replacement for Photoshop? In fact, it actually appears it may be superior :|

]]>