<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Vista Capable&#8221; Now Means a Vista Experience at the Minimum</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/vista-capable-now-means-a-vista-exerience-at-the-minimum/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/vista-capable-now-means-a-vista-exerience-at-the-minimum/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:57:44 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/vista-capable-now-means-a-vista-exerience-at-the-minimum/comment-page-1/#comment-94031</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 16:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/04/09/vista-capable-now-means-a-vista-exerience-at-the-minimum/#comment-94031</guid>
		<description>&lt;div id=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-93626&quot;&gt;PhoenixP3K wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;That&#039;s why you need to look for items branded Windows Vista Ready. When you read capable you see from the get go the term used seems weak. When I read capable, I read; going to do it&#039;s best to try and run it. My laptop is Vista Capable and according to the upgrade advisor I should even be able to run Aero...&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
Actually I have seen a lot of computers at retail stores branded as Vista Capable despite running Aero. It&#039;s weird, but I think some manufacturers just want to say that their computer is Vista Capable in case something doesn&#039;t work quite right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-93626">PhoenixP3K wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>That&#8217;s why you need to look for items branded Windows Vista Ready. When you read capable you see from the get go the term used seems weak. When I read capable, I read; going to do it&#8217;s best to try and run it. My laptop is Vista Capable and according to the upgrade advisor I should even be able to run Aero&#8230;</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Actually I have seen a lot of computers at retail stores branded as Vista Capable despite running Aero. It&#8217;s weird, but I think some manufacturers just want to say that their computer is Vista Capable in case something doesn&#8217;t work quite right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Slasher</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/vista-capable-now-means-a-vista-exerience-at-the-minimum/comment-page-1/#comment-93675</link>
		<dc:creator>The Slasher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 04:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/04/09/vista-capable-now-means-a-vista-exerience-at-the-minimum/#comment-93675</guid>
		<description>&lt;div id=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-93626&quot;&gt;PhoenixP3K wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;That&#039;s why you need to look for items branded Windows Vista Ready. When you read capable you see from the get go the term used seems weak. When I read capable, I read; going to do it&#039;s best to try and run it. My laptop is Vista Capable and according to the upgrade advisor I should even be able to run Aero...&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;


No, when you look for Vista branding and find it, you only need to run ... as fast as you can.  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-93626">PhoenixP3K wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>That&#8217;s why you need to look for items branded Windows Vista Ready. When you read capable you see from the get go the term used seems weak. When I read capable, I read; going to do it&#8217;s best to try and run it. My laptop is Vista Capable and according to the upgrade advisor I should even be able to run Aero&#8230;</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>No, when you look for Vista branding and find it, you only need to run &#8230; as fast as you can.  <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PhoenixP3K</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/vista-capable-now-means-a-vista-exerience-at-the-minimum/comment-page-1/#comment-93626</link>
		<dc:creator>PhoenixP3K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 02:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/04/09/vista-capable-now-means-a-vista-exerience-at-the-minimum/#comment-93626</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s why you need to look for items branded Windows Vista Ready. When you read capable you see from the get go the term used seems weak. When I read capable, I read; going to do it&#039;s best to try and run it. My laptop is Vista Capable and according to the upgrade advisor I should even be able to run Aero...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s why you need to look for items branded Windows Vista Ready. When you read capable you see from the get go the term used seems weak. When I read capable, I read; going to do it&#8217;s best to try and run it. My laptop is Vista Capable and according to the upgrade advisor I should even be able to run Aero&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: netster007x</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/vista-capable-now-means-a-vista-exerience-at-the-minimum/comment-page-1/#comment-93624</link>
		<dc:creator>netster007x</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 01:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/04/09/vista-capable-now-means-a-vista-exerience-at-the-minimum/#comment-93624</guid>
		<description>yah, leave microsoft alone</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yah, leave microsoft alone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
