<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Vista Computers Save about $75 per Year in Energy</title> <atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/vista-computers-save-about-75-per-year-in-engergy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://cybernetnews.com/vista-computers-save-about-75-per-year-in-engergy/</link> <description>Technology News</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 02:30:18 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/vista-computers-save-about-75-per-year-in-engergy/#comment-121228</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 18:57:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/15/vista-computers-save-about-75-per-year-in-engergy/#comment-121228</guid> <description>Balanced is definitely the route to go by default. It gives you the best of both worlds. I actually created my own custom power plan, but it is extremely similar to balanced.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balanced is definitely the route to go by default. It gives you the best of both worlds. I actually created my own custom power plan, but it is extremely similar to balanced.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Southern Cross</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/vista-computers-save-about-75-per-year-in-engergy/#comment-121134</link> <dc:creator>Southern Cross</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 23:19:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/15/vista-computers-save-about-75-per-year-in-engergy/#comment-121134</guid> <description>Seems to me that I&#039;ll be using the &quot;balanced&quot; option most of my time and the &quot;high performence&quot; (with the charger plugged in) when doing presentations... :D</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems to me that I&#8217;ll be using the &#8220;balanced&#8221; option most of my time and the &#8220;high performence&#8221; (with the charger plugged in) when doing presentations&#8230; <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: n-blue &#124; Vista Reduce Global Warming</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/vista-computers-save-about-75-per-year-in-engergy/#comment-118482</link> <dc:creator>n-blue &#124; Vista Reduce Global Warming</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 04:44:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/15/vista-computers-save-about-75-per-year-in-engergy/#comment-118482</guid> <description>[...] ????????????????? CybernetNews&#xA0; ??????? Windows Vista ??????????? [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ????????????????? CybernetNews&#xA0; ??????? Windows Vista ??????????? [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/vista-computers-save-about-75-per-year-in-engergy/#comment-118387</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 22:13:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/15/vista-computers-save-about-75-per-year-in-engergy/#comment-118387</guid> <description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-118314&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Mris wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;I just measured that my six-months old Vista dualcore-machine uses only 10 watts more energy than my four-year old computer using the power savings options.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; Wow, just 10 watts more for a dual core machine! That&#039;s pretty darn good.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-118314" rel="nofollow">Mris wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>I just measured that my six-months old Vista dualcore-machine uses only 10 watts more energy than my four-year old computer using the power savings options.</p></blockquote></div><p>Wow, just 10 watts more for a dual core machine! That&#8217;s pretty darn good.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: &#187; Sobre el ahorro de energía en Vista Win-Vista.es &#124; Blog de Windows Vista</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/vista-computers-save-about-75-per-year-in-engergy/#comment-118359</link> <dc:creator>&#187; Sobre el ahorro de energía en Vista Win-Vista.es &#124; Blog de Windows Vista</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 18:27:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/15/vista-computers-save-about-75-per-year-in-engergy/#comment-118359</guid> <description>[...] &#124; Vía Cybernet News [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] | Vía Cybernet News [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mris</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/vista-computers-save-about-75-per-year-in-engergy/#comment-118314</link> <dc:creator>Mris</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 11:43:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/15/vista-computers-save-about-75-per-year-in-engergy/#comment-118314</guid> <description>I just measured that my six-months old Vista dualcore-machine uses only 10 watts more energy than my four-year old computer using the power savings options.Normally I let the processor use 100% performance when needed but when I have to leave my computer on overnight I&#039;d like to easily switch to a power saving plan. I&#039;ve tried unsuccessfully to find a widget or something to do this with one click.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just measured that my six-months old Vista dualcore-machine uses only 10 watts more energy than my four-year old computer using the power savings options.</p><p>Normally I let the processor use 100% performance when needed but when I have to leave my computer on overnight I&#8217;d like to easily switch to a power saving plan. I&#8217;ve tried unsuccessfully to find a widget or something to do this with one click.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ITsVISTA Web Links: October 15th, 2007 &#124; ITsVISTA</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/vista-computers-save-about-75-per-year-in-engergy/#comment-118250</link> <dc:creator>ITsVISTA Web Links: October 15th, 2007 &#124; ITsVISTA</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:30:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/15/vista-computers-save-about-75-per-year-in-engergy/#comment-118250</guid> <description>[...] Vista Computers Save about $75 per Year in Energy The effects of Vista&#8217;s Power Saver plan is measurable. (tags: Power Environment ) [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Vista Computers Save about $75 per Year in Energy The effects of Vista&#8217;s Power Saver plan is measurable. (tags: Power Environment ) [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/vista-computers-save-about-75-per-year-in-engergy/#comment-118217</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 21:27:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/15/vista-computers-save-about-75-per-year-in-engergy/#comment-118217</guid> <description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-118188&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Change wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;XP users can use Performance on Demand (and other kinds of profiles) by installing the RightMark CPU Clock Utility. It runs my 2GHz CPU on 800MHz when I don’t need its power (most of the time).&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; There are several different applications that do stuff like this, but not to the extent of what Vista does. Vista also cuts back wireless performance and other things.&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-118201&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Lashiec wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;The “Blog Action Day” link is incorrect, it ends in a 404.Good to know Microsoft improved energy consumption in Vista (look, something worthwhile ;)), but I wonder if it would be an energy saver in desktop PCs as well…&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; Thanks, I fixed the link. It can be an energy saver on a desktop as well depending on what you set your power plan to. The power plans are not just for laptops.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-118188" rel="nofollow">Change wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>XP users can use Performance on Demand (and other kinds of profiles) by installing the RightMark CPU Clock Utility. It runs my 2GHz CPU on 800MHz when I don’t need its power (most of the time).</p></blockquote></div><p>There are several different applications that do stuff like this, but not to the extent of what Vista does. Vista also cuts back wireless performance and other things.</p><div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-118201" rel="nofollow">Lashiec wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>The “Blog Action Day” link is incorrect, it ends in a 404.</p><p>Good to know Microsoft improved energy consumption in Vista (look, something worthwhile <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> ), but I wonder if it would be an energy saver in desktop PCs as well…</p></blockquote></div><p>Thanks, I fixed the link. It can be an energy saver on a desktop as well depending on what you set your power plan to. The power plans are not just for laptops.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Lashiec</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/vista-computers-save-about-75-per-year-in-engergy/#comment-118201</link> <dc:creator>Lashiec</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:56:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/15/vista-computers-save-about-75-per-year-in-engergy/#comment-118201</guid> <description>The &quot;Blog Action Day&quot; link is incorrect, it ends in a 404.Good to know Microsoft improved energy consumption in Vista (look, something worthwhile ;)), but I wonder if it would be an energy saver in desktop PCs as well...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;Blog Action Day&#8221; link is incorrect, it ends in a 404.</p><p>Good to know Microsoft improved energy consumption in Vista (look, something worthwhile <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> ), but I wonder if it would be an energy saver in desktop PCs as well&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Change</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/vista-computers-save-about-75-per-year-in-engergy/#comment-118188</link> <dc:creator>Change</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 16:47:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/15/vista-computers-save-about-75-per-year-in-engergy/#comment-118188</guid> <description>XP users can use Performance on Demand (and other kinds of profiles) by installing the RightMark CPU Clock Utility. It runs my 2GHz CPU on 800MHz when I don&#039;t need its power (most of the time).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>XP users can use Performance on Demand (and other kinds of profiles) by installing the RightMark CPU Clock Utility. It runs my 2GHz CPU on 800MHz when I don&#8217;t need its power (most of the time).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 310/331 objects using disk: basic

Served from: cybernetnews.com @ 2012-05-27 08:28:03 -->
