<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Vista SP1 Download Leaked for Weeks</title> <atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/vista-sp1-download-leaked-for-weeks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://cybernetnews.com/vista-sp1-download-leaked-for-weeks/</link> <description>Technology News</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:03:20 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: C</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/vista-sp1-download-leaked-for-weeks/#comment-131188</link> <dc:creator>C</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 07:17:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/02/07/vista-sp1-download-leaked-for-weeks/#comment-131188</guid> <description>i have a dell oem version of vista and the sp1 works just fine</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have a dell oem version of vista and the sp1 works just fine</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/vista-sp1-download-leaked-for-weeks/#comment-131147</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 20:31:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/02/07/vista-sp1-download-leaked-for-weeks/#comment-131147</guid> <description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-130963&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;hunashaman wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;OK. I checked my registry and the RC 2 refresh I’m running show exactly  the build numbers in Paul’s screenshot. So I guess the RC was in fact the same as RTM.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; Yup, that was our conclusion as well.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-130963" rel="nofollow">hunashaman wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>OK. I checked my registry and the RC 2 refresh I’m running show exactly  the build numbers in Paul’s screenshot. So I guess the RC was in fact the same as RTM.</p></blockquote></div><p>Yup, that was our conclusion as well.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: hunashaman</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/vista-sp1-download-leaked-for-weeks/#comment-130963</link> <dc:creator>hunashaman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 07:02:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/02/07/vista-sp1-download-leaked-for-weeks/#comment-130963</guid> <description>OK. I checked my registry and the RC 2 refresh I&#039;m running show exactly  the build numbers in Paul&#039;s screenshot. So I guess the RC was in fact the same as RTM.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK. I checked my registry and the RC 2 refresh I&#8217;m running show exactly  the build numbers in Paul&#8217;s screenshot. So I guess the RC was in fact the same as RTM.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/vista-sp1-download-leaked-for-weeks/#comment-130943</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 23:59:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/02/07/vista-sp1-download-leaked-for-weeks/#comment-130943</guid> <description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-130911&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Anonymous wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Most OEM hacks still works :)&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; I&#039;m actually working on getting a hacked system up and running so that I can try it myself. Thanks for the heads up though.&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-130912&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Anonymous wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Does this need to be uninstalled when Microsoft releases SP1 on its own, or will Windows Update see SP1 as being already installed?&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; No, you shouldn&#039;t have to uninstall it. This is the final product and will not be changed prior to public availability.&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-130932&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;bloodsugarwilksm wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;I still don’t understand why people are installing pirated versions of SP1 for Vista… there’s a distinct possibility that it is corrupted, hacked, cracked, infected, or not the real thing.  There’s a thousand different things that could adversely affect an otherwise stable system by installing a torrent of Vista SP1…&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; It&#039;s possible to have it installed via Windows Update though, which is the hack that originally emerged. All it does is modify two registry keys, and you can see exactly what it is doing if you want. Then the downloads are pulled straight from Microsoft.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-130911" rel="nofollow">Anonymous wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>Most OEM hacks still works <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p></blockquote></div><p>I&#8217;m actually working on getting a hacked system up and running so that I can try it myself. Thanks for the heads up though.</p><div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-130912" rel="nofollow">Anonymous wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>Does this need to be uninstalled when Microsoft releases SP1 on its own, or will Windows Update see SP1 as being already installed?</p></blockquote></div><p>No, you shouldn&#8217;t have to uninstall it. This is the final product and will not be changed prior to public availability.</p><div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-130932" rel="nofollow">bloodsugarwilksm wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>I still don’t understand why people are installing pirated versions of SP1 for Vista… there’s a distinct possibility that it is corrupted, hacked, cracked, infected, or not the real thing.  There’s a thousand different things that could adversely affect an otherwise stable system by installing a torrent of Vista SP1…</p></blockquote></div><p>It&#8217;s possible to have it installed via Windows Update though, which is the hack that originally emerged. All it does is modify two registry keys, and you can see exactly what it is doing if you want. Then the downloads are pulled straight from Microsoft.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: bloodsugarwilksm</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/vista-sp1-download-leaked-for-weeks/#comment-130932</link> <dc:creator>bloodsugarwilksm</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 21:45:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/02/07/vista-sp1-download-leaked-for-weeks/#comment-130932</guid> <description>I still don&#039;t understand why people are installing pirated versions of SP1 for Vista... there&#039;s a distinct possibility that it is corrupted, hacked, cracked, infected, or not the real thing.  There&#039;s a thousand different things that could adversely affect an otherwise stable system by installing a torrent of Vista SP1...At least that&#039;s what I think.  I&#039;ll be waiting until Microsoft releases the DL on their Download site to the public.  At that point it will be worked out and stable and legitimate.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still don&#8217;t understand why people are installing pirated versions of SP1 for Vista&#8230; there&#8217;s a distinct possibility that it is corrupted, hacked, cracked, infected, or not the real thing.  There&#8217;s a thousand different things that could adversely affect an otherwise stable system by installing a torrent of Vista SP1&#8230;</p><p>At least that&#8217;s what I think.  I&#8217;ll be waiting until Microsoft releases the DL on their Download site to the public.  At that point it will be worked out and stable and legitimate.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/vista-sp1-download-leaked-for-weeks/#comment-130912</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 16:51:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/02/07/vista-sp1-download-leaked-for-weeks/#comment-130912</guid> <description>Does this need to be uninstalled when Microsoft releases SP1 on its own, or will Windows Update see SP1 as being already installed?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this need to be uninstalled when Microsoft releases SP1 on its own, or will Windows Update see SP1 as being already installed?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/vista-sp1-download-leaked-for-weeks/#comment-130911</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 16:40:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/02/07/vista-sp1-download-leaked-for-weeks/#comment-130911</guid> <description>Most OEM hacks still works :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most OEM hacks still works <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: kvascola</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/vista-sp1-download-leaked-for-weeks/#comment-130910</link> <dc:creator>kvascola</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 16:39:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/02/07/vista-sp1-download-leaked-for-weeks/#comment-130910</guid> <description>It seems to be like when i installed RTM in december 2006, not february 2007. And 3 days ago I installed and succesfully activated SP1 x64 with their hole with OEM keys. Not need to wait until official public release.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to be like when i installed RTM in december 2006, not february 2007. And 3 days ago I installed and succesfully activated SP1 x64 with their hole with OEM keys. Not need to wait until official public release.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 278/297 objects using disk: basic

Served from: cybernetnews.com @ 2012-02-13 06:03:32 -->
