<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Vote for Insane Amazon Deals</title> <atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/vote-for-insane-amazon-deals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://cybernetnews.com/vote-for-insane-amazon-deals/</link> <description>Technology News</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:03:20 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Ashley</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/vote-for-insane-amazon-deals/#comment-123921</link> <dc:creator>Ashley</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 00:47:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/21/vote-for-insane-amazon-deals/#comment-123921</guid> <description>I voted but no luck so far! :(</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I voted but no luck so far! <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/vote-for-insane-amazon-deals/#comment-123774</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 22:29:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/21/vote-for-insane-amazon-deals/#comment-123774</guid> <description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-123421&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;DKong wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;After last year, I don’t even care about this crap. The stuff sells out .0001 seconds after they start the buying day. It’s not worth my time.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; It&#039;s not the same thing as last year. They realized their flaws with that system, and so they are just randomly selecting winners from those who vote. That&#039;s why it is so great. Sure your chances of getting one are still slim to none, but at least it doesn&#039;t require that you count down the seconds on the clock.&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-123428&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;rogoisu wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;I think it’s a great idea, but I really really hate that they post the current results.  Why would anybody vote for what they want, if it’s losing badly?  I voted for a lot of things that I didn’t want, just because I’d have .0000001% chance of getting something cheaper, as opposed to no chance of getting something cheaper.  They should have posted the tivohd with the toys :P  That’s the only thing on that list I want…well I guess a PS3 wouldn’t be bad..&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; That was my thought as well. My votes were swayed by the current majority, because if you don&#039;t pick the popular item you&#039;ll likely get no chance whatsoever to win. It&#039;s a significant improvement over last year, and maybe by next year they&#039;ll have it down pat.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-123421" rel="nofollow">DKong wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>After last year, I don’t even care about this crap. The stuff sells out .0001 seconds after they start the buying day. It’s not worth my time.</p></blockquote></div><p>It&#8217;s not the same thing as last year. They realized their flaws with that system, and so they are just randomly selecting winners from those who vote. That&#8217;s why it is so great. Sure your chances of getting one are still slim to none, but at least it doesn&#8217;t require that you count down the seconds on the clock.</p><div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-123428" rel="nofollow">rogoisu wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>I think it’s a great idea, but I really really hate that they post the current results.  Why would anybody vote for what they want, if it’s losing badly?  I voted for a lot of things that I didn’t want, just because I’d have .0000001% chance of getting something cheaper, as opposed to no chance of getting something cheaper.  They should have posted the tivohd with the toys <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> That’s the only thing on that list I want…well I guess a PS3 wouldn’t be bad..</p></blockquote></div><p>That was my thought as well. My votes were swayed by the current majority, because if you don&#8217;t pick the popular item you&#8217;ll likely get no chance whatsoever to win. It&#8217;s a significant improvement over last year, and maybe by next year they&#8217;ll have it down pat.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: rogoisu</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/vote-for-insane-amazon-deals/#comment-123428</link> <dc:creator>rogoisu</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 21:17:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/21/vote-for-insane-amazon-deals/#comment-123428</guid> <description>I think it&#039;s a great idea, but I really really hate that they post the current results.  Why would anybody vote for what they want, if it&#039;s losing badly?  I voted for a lot of things that I didn&#039;t want, just because I&#039;d have .0000001% chance of getting something cheaper, as opposed to no chance of getting something cheaper.  They should have posted the tivohd with the toys :P  That&#039;s the only thing on that list I want...well I guess a PS3 wouldn&#039;t be bad..</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s a great idea, but I really really hate that they post the current results.  Why would anybody vote for what they want, if it&#8217;s losing badly?  I voted for a lot of things that I didn&#8217;t want, just because I&#8217;d have .0000001% chance of getting something cheaper, as opposed to no chance of getting something cheaper.  They should have posted the tivohd with the toys <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> That&#8217;s the only thing on that list I want&#8230;well I guess a PS3 wouldn&#8217;t be bad..</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: DKong</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/vote-for-insane-amazon-deals/#comment-123421</link> <dc:creator>DKong</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 20:30:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/21/vote-for-insane-amazon-deals/#comment-123421</guid> <description>After last year, I don&#039;t even care about this crap. The stuff sells out .0001 seconds after they start the buying day. It&#039;s not worth my time.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After last year, I don&#8217;t even care about this crap. The stuff sells out .0001 seconds after they start the buying day. It&#8217;s not worth my time.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 238/257 objects using disk: basic

Served from: cybernetnews.com @ 2012-02-13 04:30:51 -->
