<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Webware 100 Winners for 2007 Announced</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/webware-100-winners-for-2007-announced/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/webware-100-winners-for-2007-announced/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 20:26:55 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/webware-100-winners-for-2007-announced/comment-page-1/#comment-136289</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 02:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/06/19/webware-100-winners-for-2007-announced/#comment-136289</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-136257&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Omar Upegui wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;I echo with all of you regarding &lt;b&gt;Wikipedia&lt;/b&gt;. There are many knowledge elitist who are against amateur knowledge.  All Wikipedia’s articles I’ve read are up-to-date and factual. 

I was expecting &lt;b&gt;Flock&lt;/b&gt; social browser would be amongst the winners.  Anyway, &lt;b&gt;Mozilla Firefox&lt;/b&gt; was included in the winning list.  LOL!&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
This is last year&#039;s winners, and so I don&#039;t think Flock had really &quot;emerged&quot; as much as it has by now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-136257" rel="nofollow">Omar Upegui wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>I echo with all of you regarding <b>Wikipedia</b>. There are many knowledge elitist who are against amateur knowledge.  All Wikipedia’s articles I’ve read are up-to-date and factual. </p>
<p>I was expecting <b>Flock</b> social browser would be amongst the winners.  Anyway, <b>Mozilla Firefox</b> was included in the winning list.  LOL!</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>This is last year&#8217;s winners, and so I don&#8217;t think Flock had really &#8220;emerged&#8221; as much as it has by now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Omar Upegui</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/webware-100-winners-for-2007-announced/comment-page-1/#comment-136257</link>
		<dc:creator>Omar Upegui</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/06/19/webware-100-winners-for-2007-announced/#comment-136257</guid>
		<description>I echo with all of you regarding &lt;b&gt;Wikipedia&lt;/b&gt;. There are many knowledge elitist who are against amateur knowledge.  All Wikipedia&#039;s articles I&#039;ve read are up-to-date and factual. 

I was expecting &lt;b&gt;Flock&lt;/b&gt; social browser would be amongst the winners.  Anyway, &lt;b&gt;Mozilla Firefox&lt;/b&gt; was included in the winning list.  LOL!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I echo with all of you regarding <b>Wikipedia</b>. There are many knowledge elitist who are against amateur knowledge.  All Wikipedia&#8217;s articles I&#8217;ve read are up-to-date and factual. </p>
<p>I was expecting <b>Flock</b> social browser would be amongst the winners.  Anyway, <b>Mozilla Firefox</b> was included in the winning list.  LOL!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/webware-100-winners-for-2007-announced/comment-page-1/#comment-99112</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 15:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/06/19/webware-100-winners-for-2007-announced/#comment-99112</guid>
		<description>I hadn&#039;t heard of the Stardoll before, but the others I had. That Stardoll is actually kind of interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hadn&#8217;t heard of the Stardoll before, but the others I had. That Stardoll is actually kind of interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: motang</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/webware-100-winners-for-2007-announced/comment-page-1/#comment-99006</link>
		<dc:creator>motang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 16:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/06/19/webware-100-winners-for-2007-announced/#comment-99006</guid>
		<description>&lt;div id=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-98974&quot;&gt;Alex Killby wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;I expected every single result. It really joys me to see WikiPedia in there. I think there needs to be a good solid article written about Wikipedia and why it&#039;s more reliable than most people think.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
Yes Wikipedia is very good resource and I was very glad that Google and Yahoo came to their aid when they were need of servers.  It is a very good tool and a prefect example as to why the whole Internet was invented in the first place (an academic resource that people can contribute to).  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-98974">Alex Killby wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>I expected every single result. It really joys me to see WikiPedia in there. I think there needs to be a good solid article written about Wikipedia and why it&#8217;s more reliable than most people think.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Yes Wikipedia is very good resource and I was very glad that Google and Yahoo came to their aid when they were need of servers.  It is a very good tool and a prefect example as to why the whole Internet was invented in the first place (an academic resource that people can contribute to).  <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashley</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/webware-100-winners-for-2007-announced/comment-page-1/#comment-98994</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 14:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/06/19/webware-100-winners-for-2007-announced/#comment-98994</guid>
		<description>You know Alex, that&#039;s not a bad idea. I use Wikipedia all the time and haven&#039;t come across anything that was inaccurate. I know it happens, but I haven&#039;t experienced it yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know Alex, that&#8217;s not a bad idea. I use Wikipedia all the time and haven&#8217;t come across anything that was inaccurate. I know it happens, but I haven&#8217;t experienced it yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Killby</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/webware-100-winners-for-2007-announced/comment-page-1/#comment-98974</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Killby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 04:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/06/19/webware-100-winners-for-2007-announced/#comment-98974</guid>
		<description>I expected every single result. It really joys me to see WikiPedia in there. I think there needs to be a good solid article written about Wikipedia and why it&#039;s more reliable than most people think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I expected every single result. It really joys me to see WikiPedia in there. I think there needs to be a good solid article written about Wikipedia and why it&#8217;s more reliable than most people think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
