<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Happened to the Original Google Video?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/what-happened-to-the-original-google-video/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/what-happened-to-the-original-google-video/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 17:32:04 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/what-happened-to-the-original-google-video/comment-page-1/#comment-70088</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 18:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/01/02/what-happened-to-the-original-google-video/#comment-70088</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m actually really surprised that television networks haven&#039;t started making the transcripts available online. They could even charge some sort of &quot;subscription&quot; fee so that users could quickly access them after the shows aired. That really boggles my mind why it hasn&#039;t been done yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m actually really surprised that television networks haven&#8217;t started making the transcripts available online. They could even charge some sort of &#8220;subscription&#8221; fee so that users could quickly access them after the shows aired. That really boggles my mind why it hasn&#8217;t been done yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: curtissthompson</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/what-happened-to-the-original-google-video/comment-page-1/#comment-68994</link>
		<dc:creator>curtissthompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 15:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/01/02/what-happened-to-the-original-google-video/#comment-68994</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I think the services are often kept separate because they are targeting different audiences. Yahoo Photos, for example, is more for the casual users while people using Flickr are a little more advanced. Or at least that is what I have read before. If they eliminate the service then they risk losing some of their users to a competitor.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I have to say I agree with ryan on the point of the services, but that can prove to be the downfall of one or both of the services because of their inability to market one product to the 2 crowds, the tech savvy early adopters and the more tech inept general public.  It&#039;s fundamental to the success of technology products and services as well as Internet start-ups that you can &quot;Cross The Chasm&quot; (&lt;--great book on the subject) and market your services beyond the tech savvy to the general public...that&#039;s the true sign of successful design and marketing.

I actually remember them discussing this a while back myself...and was extremely excited to hear it, because that service would have been immensely useful to me.  As I will often be watching a documentary or news program that I need a transcript of in order to source information for personal research and writing, or for research papers for school.  I would often find myself calling and emailing stations like CNBC asking for a copy of their transcript (for free or for a fee), and they would simply reply we can get you a copy of the show on VHS that would arrive at my address several weeks upon ordering it.  That simply wouldn&#039;t help me, because it was anything but timely, and was more difficult to transfer the information..seeing as I would have to listen and write/type it all down at the same time it was playing.  I really hope Google, or someone else does this in the future, it would make research and sourcing information for me, incredibly easier, as so many websites for tv networks, simply do not maintain transcripts for their show after they air, let alone post those transcripts online for people to read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I think the services are often kept separate because they are targeting different audiences. Yahoo Photos, for example, is more for the casual users while people using Flickr are a little more advanced. Or at least that is what I have read before. If they eliminate the service then they risk losing some of their users to a competitor.</p></blockquote>
<p>I have to say I agree with ryan on the point of the services, but that can prove to be the downfall of one or both of the services because of their inability to market one product to the 2 crowds, the tech savvy early adopters and the more tech inept general public.  It&#8217;s fundamental to the success of technology products and services as well as Internet start-ups that you can &#8220;Cross The Chasm&#8221; (<&#8211;great book on the subject) and market your services beyond the tech savvy to the general public&#8230;that&#8217;s the true sign of successful design and marketing.</p>
<p>I actually remember them discussing this a while back myself&#8230;and was extremely excited to hear it, because that service would have been immensely useful to me.  As I will often be watching a documentary or news program that I need a transcript of in order to source information for personal research and writing, or for research papers for school.  I would often find myself calling and emailing stations like CNBC asking for a copy of their transcript (for free or for a fee), and they would simply reply we can get you a copy of the show on VHS that would arrive at my address several weeks upon ordering it.  That simply wouldn&#8217;t help me, because it was anything but timely, and was more difficult to transfer the information..seeing as I would have to listen and write/type it all down at the same time it was playing.  I really hope Google, or someone else does this in the future, it would make research and sourcing information for me, incredibly easier, as so many websites for tv networks, simply do not maintain transcripts for their show after they air, let alone post those transcripts online for people to read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/what-happened-to-the-original-google-video/comment-page-1/#comment-68642</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 09:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/01/02/what-happened-to-the-original-google-video/#comment-68642</guid>
		<description>I think the services are often kept separate because they are targeting different audiences. Yahoo Photos, for example, is more for the casual users while people using Flickr are a little more advanced. Or at least that is what I have read before. If they eliminate the service then they risk losing some of their users to a competitor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the services are often kept separate because they are targeting different audiences. Yahoo Photos, for example, is more for the casual users while people using Flickr are a little more advanced. Or at least that is what I have read before. If they eliminate the service then they risk losing some of their users to a competitor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: netster007x</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/what-happened-to-the-original-google-video/comment-page-1/#comment-68447</link>
		<dc:creator>netster007x</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 06:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/01/02/what-happened-to-the-original-google-video/#comment-68447</guid>
		<description>Wow, those are some strange concepts Google had going before.  

Yahoo! kind of has both forms of video:
-News/TV videos (although somewhat hidden and many videos are Plus only) 
-YouTube like videos

Here&#039;s the URL the player shows me.  This URL probably won&#039;t work for you, however.  If you look at news stories it often says &quot;related video&quot; with a javascript link to the video player
&lt;http://cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com/scp_v3/viewer/index.php?pid=16010&amp;rn=20826&amp;ch=130510&gt;

About YouTube, I always wonder when sites own multiple sites that do basically the same thing.  
Ex&#039;s=
Y! Photos and Flickr 
Y! Myweb and Y! bookmarks beta and del.icio.us
Google video and YouTube
etc...
It seems to me a waste to maintain two competing sites that do the same function.  Why not just evaluate both, determine which is most advanced, and put all the effort on making the advanced one even better.  Then give users of the other site an early warning and the ability to sync their content to the chosen site and drop the inferior one.

I&#039;m pretty surprised YouTube remains fully un-modified.  No link at the bottom to Google or anything.  They haven&#039;t even changed &quot;about us&quot; page to mention Google.

BTW: loved that video a while back of the future of YouTube under Google&#039;s ownership</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, those are some strange concepts Google had going before.  </p>
<p>Yahoo! kind of has both forms of video:<br />
-News/TV videos (although somewhat hidden and many videos are Plus only)<br />
-YouTube like videos</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the URL the player shows me.  This URL probably won&#8217;t work for you, however.  If you look at news stories it often says &#8220;related video&#8221; with a javascript link to the video player<br />
< [<a href='http://cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com/scp_v3/viewer/index.php?pid=16010&#038;rn=20826&#038;ch=130510' rel='nofollow'>cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com]></p>
<p>About YouTube, I always wonder when sites own multiple sites that do basically the same thing.<br />
Ex&#8217;s=<br />
Y! Photos and Flickr<br />
Y! Myweb and Y! bookmarks beta and del.icio.us<br />
Google video and YouTube<br />
etc&#8230;<br />
It seems to me a waste to maintain two competing sites that do the same function.  Why not just evaluate both, determine which is most advanced, and put all the effort on making the advanced one even better.  Then give users of the other site an early warning and the ability to sync their content to the chosen site and drop the inferior one.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m pretty surprised YouTube remains fully un-modified.  No link at the bottom to Google or anything.  They haven&#8217;t even changed &#8220;about us&#8221; page to mention Google.</p>
<p>BTW: loved that video a while back of the future of YouTube under Google&#8217;s ownership</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
