<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Which is More Accurate: Wikipedia or Encyclopedia Britannica?</title> <atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/which-is-more-accurate-wikipedia-or-encyclopedia-britannica/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://cybernetnews.com/which-is-more-accurate-wikipedia-or-encyclopedia-britannica/</link> <description>Technology News</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 18:53:49 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/which-is-more-accurate-wikipedia-or-encyclopedia-britannica/#comment-111542</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 22:52:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/07/26/which-is-more-accurate-wikipedia-or-encyclopedia-britannica/#comment-111542</guid> <description>Much like Mr. Defeatable I too love that Wikipedia cites their sources. It makes it a more credible source to get your information from, and when you&#039;re writing a paper it gives you a nice variety of references. All hail Wikipedia.  :lol:</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much like Mr. Defeatable I too love that Wikipedia cites their sources. It makes it a more credible source to get your information from, and when you&#8217;re writing a paper it gives you a nice variety of references. All hail Wikipedia. <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_lol.gif' alt=':lol:' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tinhed</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/which-is-more-accurate-wikipedia-or-encyclopedia-britannica/#comment-111499</link> <dc:creator>Tinhed</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 16:41:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/07/26/which-is-more-accurate-wikipedia-or-encyclopedia-britannica/#comment-111499</guid> <description>Wikipedia is an excellent starting point when you are searching for an overview of a particular topic. Plus the references cited Provide more details. Wikipedia is the first site that comes in mind whenever i need information on anything.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wikipedia is an excellent starting point when you are searching for an overview of a particular topic. Plus the references cited Provide more details. Wikipedia is the first site that comes in mind whenever i need information on anything.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Irian</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/which-is-more-accurate-wikipedia-or-encyclopedia-britannica/#comment-111347</link> <dc:creator>Irian</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 19:54:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/07/26/which-is-more-accurate-wikipedia-or-encyclopedia-britannica/#comment-111347</guid> <description>Wikipedia is a great resource for starting researching a particular topic, as it provides a good overview of the topic with some additional references.  It should never be your only source of information tho.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wikipedia is a great resource for starting researching a particular topic, as it provides a good overview of the topic with some additional references.  It should never be your only source of information tho.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kyle Eslick</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/which-is-more-accurate-wikipedia-or-encyclopedia-britannica/#comment-111315</link> <dc:creator>Kyle Eslick</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 17:02:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/07/26/which-is-more-accurate-wikipedia-or-encyclopedia-britannica/#comment-111315</guid> <description>Whenever I&#039;ve used Wikipedia, I&#039;ve always been surprised at how much information was available.  I believe most of it is accurate, or at least as accurate as possible.I don&#039;t think professor&#039;s will ever be able to except citings of Wikipedia though, because it isn&#039;t official.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whenever I&#8217;ve used Wikipedia, I&#8217;ve always been surprised at how much information was available.  I believe most of it is accurate, or at least as accurate as possible.</p><p>I don&#8217;t think professor&#8217;s will ever be able to except citings of Wikipedia though, because it isn&#8217;t official.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: mr.defeatable</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/which-is-more-accurate-wikipedia-or-encyclopedia-britannica/#comment-111314</link> <dc:creator>mr.defeatable</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 17:01:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/07/26/which-is-more-accurate-wikipedia-or-encyclopedia-britannica/#comment-111314</guid> <description>I often used Wikipedia as a resource (without citing it) when working on my college papers; because they list all of the sources used for the article and then I back tracked to the sources listed for my concrete information. So even if Wikipedia is inaccurate at least you can find the accurate information using the sources listed.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I often used Wikipedia as a resource (without citing it) when working on my college papers; because they list all of the sources used for the article and then I back tracked to the sources listed for my concrete information. So even if Wikipedia is inaccurate at least you can find the accurate information using the sources listed.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 247/268 objects using disk: basic

Served from: cybernetnews.com @ 2012-05-27 14:33:17 -->
