<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Which is More Accurate: Wikipedia or Encyclopedia Britannica?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/which-is-more-accurate-wikipedia-or-encyclopedia-britannica/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/which-is-more-accurate-wikipedia-or-encyclopedia-britannica/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:45:09 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/which-is-more-accurate-wikipedia-or-encyclopedia-britannica/comment-page-1/#comment-111542</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 22:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/07/26/which-is-more-accurate-wikipedia-or-encyclopedia-britannica/#comment-111542</guid>
		<description>Much like Mr. Defeatable I too love that Wikipedia cites their sources. It makes it a more credible source to get your information from, and when you&#039;re writing a paper it gives you a nice variety of references. All hail Wikipedia.  :lol:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much like Mr. Defeatable I too love that Wikipedia cites their sources. It makes it a more credible source to get your information from, and when you&#8217;re writing a paper it gives you a nice variety of references. All hail Wikipedia.  <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_lol.gif' alt=':lol:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tinhed</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/which-is-more-accurate-wikipedia-or-encyclopedia-britannica/comment-page-1/#comment-111499</link>
		<dc:creator>Tinhed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 16:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/07/26/which-is-more-accurate-wikipedia-or-encyclopedia-britannica/#comment-111499</guid>
		<description>Wikipedia is an excellent starting point when you are searching for an overview of a particular topic. Plus the references cited Provide more details. Wikipedia is the first site that comes in mind whenever i need information on anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wikipedia is an excellent starting point when you are searching for an overview of a particular topic. Plus the references cited Provide more details. Wikipedia is the first site that comes in mind whenever i need information on anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irian</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/which-is-more-accurate-wikipedia-or-encyclopedia-britannica/comment-page-1/#comment-111347</link>
		<dc:creator>Irian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 19:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/07/26/which-is-more-accurate-wikipedia-or-encyclopedia-britannica/#comment-111347</guid>
		<description>Wikipedia is a great resource for starting researching a particular topic, as it provides a good overview of the topic with some additional references.  It should never be your only source of information tho.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wikipedia is a great resource for starting researching a particular topic, as it provides a good overview of the topic with some additional references.  It should never be your only source of information tho.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle Eslick</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/which-is-more-accurate-wikipedia-or-encyclopedia-britannica/comment-page-1/#comment-111315</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Eslick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 17:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/07/26/which-is-more-accurate-wikipedia-or-encyclopedia-britannica/#comment-111315</guid>
		<description>Whenever I&#039;ve used Wikipedia, I&#039;ve always been surprised at how much information was available.  I believe most of it is accurate, or at least as accurate as possible.  

I don&#039;t think professor&#039;s will ever be able to except citings of Wikipedia though, because it isn&#039;t official.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whenever I&#8217;ve used Wikipedia, I&#8217;ve always been surprised at how much information was available.  I believe most of it is accurate, or at least as accurate as possible.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think professor&#8217;s will ever be able to except citings of Wikipedia though, because it isn&#8217;t official.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mr.defeatable</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/which-is-more-accurate-wikipedia-or-encyclopedia-britannica/comment-page-1/#comment-111314</link>
		<dc:creator>mr.defeatable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 17:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/07/26/which-is-more-accurate-wikipedia-or-encyclopedia-britannica/#comment-111314</guid>
		<description>I often used Wikipedia as a resource (without citing it) when working on my college papers; because they list all of the sources used for the article and then I back tracked to the sources listed for my concrete information. So even if Wikipedia is inaccurate at least you can find the accurate information using the sources listed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I often used Wikipedia as a resource (without citing it) when working on my college papers; because they list all of the sources used for the article and then I back tracked to the sources listed for my concrete information. So even if Wikipedia is inaccurate at least you can find the accurate information using the sources listed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
