<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: While We Were Gone&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/while-we-were-gone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/while-we-were-gone/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:30:02 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/while-we-were-gone/comment-page-1/#comment-138137</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 19:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=12641#comment-138137</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-138104&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;leland wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;The CBS deal seems big on the outside, but it’s kind of like two giant old media outlets merging, but into what?  I read an interesting article talking about Cnet being the king of the Web 1.0 world that just has not made the transition to web 2.0 or beyond.  CBS is such a big company I don’t see it really helping Cnet to grow it’s audience.  It will be interesting to see how that plays out.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
The first thing that popped into my head though was CBS&#039;s ability to market and advertise CNET to mainstream audiences. They could probably give the site quite a boost if they through in TV commercials here and there targeting things that people would be looking for, such as cameras.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-138104" rel="nofollow">leland wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>The CBS deal seems big on the outside, but it’s kind of like two giant old media outlets merging, but into what?  I read an interesting article talking about Cnet being the king of the Web 1.0 world that just has not made the transition to web 2.0 or beyond.  CBS is such a big company I don’t see it really helping Cnet to grow it’s audience.  It will be interesting to see how that plays out.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>The first thing that popped into my head though was CBS&#8217;s ability to market and advertise CNET to mainstream audiences. They could probably give the site quite a boost if they through in TV commercials here and there targeting things that people would be looking for, such as cameras.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashley</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/while-we-were-gone/comment-page-1/#comment-138129</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 18:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=12641#comment-138129</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-138104&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;leland wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;

No Dictionary.com for me; for me it’s OneLook &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.onelook.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.onelook.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
You know, there are so many good dictionary services out there, but my problem is I can never remember them so I automatically turn to dictionary.com because that is at least easy to remember.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-138104" rel="nofollow">leland wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>
<p>No Dictionary.com for me; for me it’s OneLook [<a href='http://www.onelook.com' rel='nofollow'>onelook.com</a>]</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>You know, there are so many good dictionary services out there, but my problem is I can never remember them so I automatically turn to dictionary.com because that is at least easy to remember.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leland</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/while-we-were-gone/comment-page-1/#comment-138104</link>
		<dc:creator>leland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 04:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=12641#comment-138104</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s good to see your back.  Glad to hear you had a good time. 

The CBS deal seems big on the outside, but it&#039;s kind of like two giant old media outlets merging, but into what?  I read an interesting article talking about Cnet being the king of the Web 1.0 world that just has not made the transition to web 2.0 or beyond.  CBS is such a big company I don&#039;t see it really helping Cnet to grow it&#039;s audience.  It will be interesting to see how that plays out.

No Dictionary.com for me; for me it&#039;s OneLook http://www.onelook.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s good to see your back.  Glad to hear you had a good time. </p>
<p>The CBS deal seems big on the outside, but it&#8217;s kind of like two giant old media outlets merging, but into what?  I read an interesting article talking about Cnet being the king of the Web 1.0 world that just has not made the transition to web 2.0 or beyond.  CBS is such a big company I don&#8217;t see it really helping Cnet to grow it&#8217;s audience.  It will be interesting to see how that plays out.</p>
<p>No Dictionary.com for me; for me it&#8217;s OneLook [<a href='http://www.onelook.com' rel='nofollow'>onelook.com</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Omar Upegui</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/while-we-were-gone/comment-page-1/#comment-138065</link>
		<dc:creator>Omar Upegui</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 19:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=12641#comment-138065</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-138028&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;skh.pcola wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;I _used_ to use Dictionary.com until I found WordWeb.  Now checking definitions or spelling is one-click easy.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://wordweb.info/free/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://wordweb.info/free/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

I have been using &lt;b&gt;WordWeb&lt;/b&gt; for more than a year with &lt;i&gt;fantabulous&lt;/i&gt; results.  It&#039;s use is so intuitive that my fingers automatically go for the icon on the Task Bar to look for a word meaning or for a synonym.

I would encourage Ryan to write a review about this very useful application.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-138028" rel="nofollow">skh.pcola wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>I _used_ to use Dictionary.com until I found WordWeb.  Now checking definitions or spelling is one-click easy.</p>
<p>[<a href='http://wordweb.info/free/' rel='nofollow'>wordweb.info</a>]</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>I have been using <b>WordWeb</b> for more than a year with <i>fantabulous</i> results.  It&#8217;s use is so intuitive that my fingers automatically go for the icon on the Task Bar to look for a word meaning or for a synonym.</p>
<p>I would encourage Ryan to write a review about this very useful application.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/while-we-were-gone/comment-page-1/#comment-138035</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 18:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=12641#comment-138035</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-138023&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Change wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Good to see you guys back, hope you had a good time!&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
We definitely had a good time, but it did end up being a rather hectic trip. Lots of running around to do in a short amount of time.

&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-138023&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Change wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;I didn’t know the CBS-CNET deal was officially completed already. Not sure if I like to see all these media giants grow bigger and bigger, leaving less and less space to real competition (not status quo).&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
CBS actually has a press release on it themselves, so it is pretty much official:
http://www.cbscorporation.com/news/prdetails.php?id=3263
From what I gather they&#039;ve agreed upon a price and the details, and so all that&#039;s left is for them to sign on the dotted line.

Personally I don&#039;t like to see the &quot;big guys&quot; making all of these acquisitions. It makes it that much harder for the little guys to succeed since they don&#039;t have the funding that these large corporations do.

&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-138028&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;skh.pcola wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;I _used_ to use Dictionary.com until I found WordWeb.  Now checking definitions or spelling is one-click easy.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
Very cool program! Almost reminds me of Mac&#039;s built-in dictionary/Wikipedia lookup. I&#039;ll have to give that a spin and see if it&#039;s worth writing about. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-138023" rel="nofollow">Change wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>Good to see you guys back, hope you had a good time!</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>We definitely had a good time, but it did end up being a rather hectic trip. Lots of running around to do in a short amount of time.</p>
<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-138023" rel="nofollow">Change wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>I didn’t know the CBS-CNET deal was officially completed already. Not sure if I like to see all these media giants grow bigger and bigger, leaving less and less space to real competition (not status quo).</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>CBS actually has a press release on it themselves, so it is pretty much official:<br />
[<a href='http://www.cbscorporation.com/news/prdetails.php?id=3263' rel='nofollow'>cbscorporation.com</a>]<br />
From what I gather they&#8217;ve agreed upon a price and the details, and so all that&#8217;s left is for them to sign on the dotted line.</p>
<p>Personally I don&#8217;t like to see the &#8220;big guys&#8221; making all of these acquisitions. It makes it that much harder for the little guys to succeed since they don&#8217;t have the funding that these large corporations do.</p>
<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-138028" rel="nofollow">skh.pcola wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>I _used_ to use Dictionary.com until I found WordWeb.  Now checking definitions or spelling is one-click easy.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Very cool program! Almost reminds me of Mac&#8217;s built-in dictionary/Wikipedia lookup. I&#8217;ll have to give that a spin and see if it&#8217;s worth writing about. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skh.pcola</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/while-we-were-gone/comment-page-1/#comment-138028</link>
		<dc:creator>skh.pcola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 17:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=12641#comment-138028</guid>
		<description>I _used_ to use Dictionary.com until I found WordWeb.  Now checking definitions or spelling is one-click easy.

http://wordweb.info/free/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I _used_ to use Dictionary.com until I found WordWeb.  Now checking definitions or spelling is one-click easy.</p>
<p>[<a href='http://wordweb.info/free/' rel='nofollow'>wordweb.info</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Change</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/while-we-were-gone/comment-page-1/#comment-138023</link>
		<dc:creator>Change</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 16:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=12641#comment-138023</guid>
		<description>Good to see you guys back, hope you had a good time!

I didn&#039;t know the CBS-CNET deal was officially completed already. Not sure if I like to see all these media giants grow bigger and bigger, leaving less and less space to real competition (not status quo).

I definitely like the changes to the Digg comment system! Great to see they keep improving, in a good way. I do hope they will get rid of the comment digging though, and go for average instead. I suppose they won&#039;t because it sort of copies the article digging, which makes the site be &quot;digg.com&quot; :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to see you guys back, hope you had a good time!</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t know the CBS-CNET deal was officially completed already. Not sure if I like to see all these media giants grow bigger and bigger, leaving less and less space to real competition (not status quo).</p>
<p>I definitely like the changes to the Digg comment system! Great to see they keep improving, in a good way. I do hope they will get rid of the comment digging though, and go for average instead. I suppose they won&#8217;t because it sort of copies the article digging, which makes the site be &#8220;digg.com&#8221; <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
