<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will Google Services Be Compatible With Other Browsers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/will-google-services-be-compatible-with-other-browsers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/will-google-services-be-compatible-with-other-browsers/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:26:22 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/will-google-services-be-compatible-with-other-browsers/comment-page-1/#comment-4136</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 04:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/06/07/will-google-services-be-compatible-with-other-browsers/#comment-4136</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re barking up the wrong tree.  Browser compatibility is not the goal to aim for.  All web service providers should be looking at making their sites congruent with the Internet standards (particularly for (x)html, ecmascript, css, et al).  Then when web browser authors make their web browsers congruent to the same standards, everyone is compatible by default.  That&#039;s why these standards exist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re barking up the wrong tree.  Browser compatibility is not the goal to aim for.  All web service providers should be looking at making their sites congruent with the Internet standards (particularly for (x)html, ecmascript, css, et al).  Then when web browser authors make their web browsers congruent to the same standards, everyone is compatible by default.  That&#8217;s why these standards exist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
