<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will Google&#8217;s Knol Compete with Wikipedia?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/will-googles-knol-compete-with-wikipedia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/will-googles-knol-compete-with-wikipedia/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:19:52 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/will-googles-knol-compete-with-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-141054</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 20:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=14005#comment-141054</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-141045&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;nick wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;I’m guessing people will just copy from wikipedia to Knol.  I mean, what else?&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
Funny you said that. I think that was the first thing that came out of my mouth when I pulled up the service last night. There&#039;s no doubt that this will happen, and people will try to make money from it with the ads.

&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-141049&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Lashiec wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;A commenter in the associated Ars Technica news story suggested that this was more alike About.com, and after giving it a whirl, I’d be inclined to agree, there are a few entries that would have no place in any regular encyclopedia (either an online or paper one), like “How to Backpack”, or “Toilet Clogs”, because they’re How-To articles actually.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
I noticed that as well. Although it is designed to be a knowledge base rather than just an encyclopedia, which means both the how-to and encyclopedia-like articles both have a home on the site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-141045" rel="nofollow">nick wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>I’m guessing people will just copy from wikipedia to Knol.  I mean, what else?</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Funny you said that. I think that was the first thing that came out of my mouth when I pulled up the service last night. There&#8217;s no doubt that this will happen, and people will try to make money from it with the ads.</p>
<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-141049" rel="nofollow">Lashiec wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>A commenter in the associated Ars Technica news story suggested that this was more alike About.com, and after giving it a whirl, I’d be inclined to agree, there are a few entries that would have no place in any regular encyclopedia (either an online or paper one), like “How to Backpack”, or “Toilet Clogs”, because they’re How-To articles actually.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>I noticed that as well. Although it is designed to be a knowledge base rather than just an encyclopedia, which means both the how-to and encyclopedia-like articles both have a home on the site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lashiec</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/will-googles-knol-compete-with-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-141049</link>
		<dc:creator>Lashiec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 20:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=14005#comment-141049</guid>
		<description>A commenter in the associated Ars Technica news story suggested that this was more alike About.com, and after giving it a whirl, I&#039;d be inclined to agree, there are a few entries that would have no place in any regular encyclopedia (either an online or paper one), like &quot;How to Backpack&quot;, or &quot;Toilet Clogs&quot;, because they&#039;re How-To articles actually.

There are also a couple of articles in the true sense of the word, like one focusing in the venture of designing a self-driving car by its own creator, or a review of Devil May Cry 4. Such things would be immediately ruled out of the Wikipedia or Citizendium for various reasons (vanity articles, lack of objectivism, etc.)

Also, they enforced the definition of an article owner since you first reported about Knol in a way that practically rules out collaboration in editing. While it&#039;s good that a person is in charge of an article, in certain situations it could be a disaster (&quot;This article is mine, and I decide what it gets into it&quot;, for example)

In any case, I still think it&#039;s a interesting project, that will co-exist with the Wikipedia and similar sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A commenter in the associated Ars Technica news story suggested that this was more alike About.com, and after giving it a whirl, I&#8217;d be inclined to agree, there are a few entries that would have no place in any regular encyclopedia (either an online or paper one), like &#8220;How to Backpack&#8221;, or &#8220;Toilet Clogs&#8221;, because they&#8217;re How-To articles actually.</p>
<p>There are also a couple of articles in the true sense of the word, like one focusing in the venture of designing a self-driving car by its own creator, or a review of Devil May Cry 4. Such things would be immediately ruled out of the Wikipedia or Citizendium for various reasons (vanity articles, lack of objectivism, etc.)</p>
<p>Also, they enforced the definition of an article owner since you first reported about Knol in a way that practically rules out collaboration in editing. While it&#8217;s good that a person is in charge of an article, in certain situations it could be a disaster (&#8221;This article is mine, and I decide what it gets into it&#8221;, for example)</p>
<p>In any case, I still think it&#8217;s a interesting project, that will co-exist with the Wikipedia and similar sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/will-googles-knol-compete-with-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-141045</link>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 18:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=14005#comment-141045</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m guessing people will just copy from wikipedia to Knol.  I mean, what else?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m guessing people will just copy from wikipedia to Knol.  I mean, what else?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
