Comments on: Windows 7 is No Longer Just a Codename http://cybernetnews.com/windows-7-is-no-longer-just-a-codename/ Technology News Sun, 27 May 2012 18:53:49 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Ryanhttp://cybernetnews.com/windows-7-is-no-longer-just-a-codename/#comment-144002 Ryan Sat, 18 Oct 2008 20:48:58 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/?p=15413#comment-144002 <div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-143915" rel="nofollow">harrison bergeron wrote:</a><blockquote>I think it was a good move. Right now everyone refers to Windows Vista just as Vista, and Windows XP just as XP. Calling it Windows 7 brings back the name recognition that they seem to be wanting.</blockquote></div> That's a really interesting perspective, and I bet your spot on with why they made the choice they did. I know I'm guilty of dropping "Windows" when I refer to Vista or XP. harrison bergeron wrote:
I think it was a good move. Right now everyone refers to Windows Vista just as Vista, and Windows XP just as XP. Calling it Windows 7 brings back the name recognition that they seem to be wanting.

That’s a really interesting perspective, and I bet your spot on with why they made the choice they did. I know I’m guilty of dropping “Windows” when I refer to Vista or XP.

]]> By: Mohanhttp://cybernetnews.com/windows-7-is-no-longer-just-a-codename/#comment-143938 Mohan Wed, 15 Oct 2008 18:53:57 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/?p=15413#comment-143938 I actually like that it's the actual name. Much better than Vista IMO. 8) I actually like that it’s the actual name. Much better than Vista IMO. 8)

]]> By: Ted Murphyhttp://cybernetnews.com/windows-7-is-no-longer-just-a-codename/#comment-143924 Ted Murphy Wed, 15 Oct 2008 03:04:47 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/?p=15413#comment-143924 Will this be the one that drives that illusive upgrade cycle? Windows 7 is supposed to be available on 1/30/2010. Or should I say "supposed" to be "available" on "1/30/2010". Will this be the one that drives that illusive upgrade cycle? Windows 7 is supposed to be available on 1/30/2010. Or should I say “supposed” to be “available” on “1/30/2010″.

]]> By: netster007xhttp://cybernetnews.com/windows-7-is-no-longer-just-a-codename/#comment-143920 netster007x Wed, 15 Oct 2008 00:09:37 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/?p=15413#comment-143920 Really I don't think UAC is all the trouble it's hyped as. I just switched it off once and I've never been bugged by it since. Really I don’t think UAC is all the trouble it’s hyped as. I just switched it off once and I’ve never been bugged by it since.

]]> By: harrison bergeronhttp://cybernetnews.com/windows-7-is-no-longer-just-a-codename/#comment-143915 harrison bergeron Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:49:48 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/?p=15413#comment-143915 I think it was a good move. Right now everyone refers to Windows Vista just as Vista, and Windows XP just as XP. Calling it Windows 7 brings back the name recognition that they seem to be wanting. I think it was a good move. Right now everyone refers to Windows Vista just as Vista, and Windows XP just as XP. Calling it Windows 7 brings back the name recognition that they seem to be wanting.

]]> By: ameohttp://cybernetnews.com/windows-7-is-no-longer-just-a-codename/#comment-143914 ameo Tue, 14 Oct 2008 16:51:58 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/?p=15413#comment-143914 i like to see this "Don't ask me again" Feature. Hope MS consider Offering Windows 7 at low Cost! * Just Dreaming* i like to see this “Don’t ask me again” Feature. Hope MS consider Offering Windows 7 at low Cost! * Just Dreaming*

]]>