http://cybernetnews.com/yahoo-getting-in-on-vista-gadgets/ Technology News Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:19:52 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 http://cybernetnews.com/yahoo-getting-in-on-vista-gadgets/comment-page-1/#comment-88390 Ryan Wed, 07 Feb 2007 06:05:29 +0000 http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/02/06/yahoo-getting-in-on-vista-gadgets/#comment-88390 We should just compile a list of things that Google needs to do and start a petition of some sort. I'm sure it wouldn't do much good, but it would be funny. We should just compile a list of things that Google needs to do and start a petition of some sort. I’m sure it wouldn’t do much good, but it would be funny.

]]> http://cybernetnews.com/yahoo-getting-in-on-vista-gadgets/comment-page-1/#comment-88386 MetaMan Wed, 07 Feb 2007 02:41:13 +0000 http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/02/06/yahoo-getting-in-on-vista-gadgets/#comment-88386 <p>This is <strong>EXACTLY</strong> what Google should do! By that, I mean <em>an exact duplicate</em>. It is perfect. I know Google has their own ideas of simplicity and what things should look like, but they are really falling behind. Remember, they vowed to put the user first, and the user would definitely like this! (The user would also like a <a href="http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/11/14/new-google-desktop-is-compatible-with-vista/#comment-36992">Google Desktop client that integrates</a> <a href="http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/11/14/new-google-desktop-is-compatible-with-vista/#comment-37024">with the Vista sidebar</a> and a <a href="http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/01/08/yahoo-designs-messenger-specifically-for-vista/#comment-73264">chat client</a> <a href="http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/01/08/yahoo-designs-messenger-specifically-for-vista/#comment-73386">with tabs</a> ;) .)</p> This is EXACTLY what Google should do! By that, I mean an exact duplicate. It is perfect. I know Google has their own ideas of simplicity and what things should look like, but they are really falling behind. Remember, they vowed to put the user first, and the user would definitely like this! (The user would also like a [tech.cybernetnews.com] [tech.cybernetnews.com] and a [tech.cybernetnews.com] [tech.cybernetnews.com] .)

]]>