Comments on: You Age So Shouldn’t Your Firefox Tabs? http://cybernetnews.com/you-age-so-shouldnt-your-firefox-tabs/ Technology News Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:45:09 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Bitelia » Una de pestañas de Firefox 2.0 http://cybernetnews.com/you-age-so-shouldnt-your-firefox-tabs/comment-page-1/#comment-36186 Bitelia » Una de pestañas de Firefox 2.0 Mon, 13 Nov 2006 10:05:06 +0000 http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/11/06/you-age-so-shouldnt-your-firefox-tabs/#comment-36186 [...] (Via TechCrunch & TechCrunch) [...] [...] (Via TechCrunch & TechCrunch) [...]

]]> By: Ryan http://cybernetnews.com/you-age-so-shouldnt-your-firefox-tabs/comment-page-1/#comment-33558 Ryan Tue, 07 Nov 2006 14:15:47 +0000 http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/11/06/you-age-so-shouldnt-your-firefox-tabs/#comment-33558 <div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-33165">netster007x wrote:</a><blockquote>Also, it's terribly annoying when I'm reading your tech news in the Y! Mail Beta RSS feed reader and there is a good picture of the feature you're explaining. If it's possible, I would greatly enjoy it if feed pictures were embedded into the RSS feed 8)</blockquote></div> We have thought about including the images in the feed but there are several sites that retrieve our feed to display on their own site and make it look like their own content. This way we are at least saving the bandwidth that these people would be using of ours. <div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-33170">TheSlasher wrote:</a><blockquote>Why on earth did Mozilla have ugly grey as the active tab colour? And dark grey for non-active? They didn't do themselves any favors with FF 2.0.</blockquote></div> I never really noticed that the active tab wasn't very noticeable until I had seen the blue one. It is very hard to go back now. <div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-33386">gluon wrote:</a><blockquote>Ryan: would you mind telling me the name of the windows style you used in the above screenshot? I've been looking for this whole-button-in-window-border vista-style quite some time now - whithout luck :? thanks in advance ;)</blockquote></div> Well, actually it is Windows Vista. :) netster007x wrote:
Also, it’s terribly annoying when I’m reading your tech news in the Y! Mail Beta RSS feed reader and there is a good picture of the feature you’re explaining. If it’s possible, I would greatly enjoy it if feed pictures were embedded into the RSS feed 8)

We have thought about including the images in the feed but there are several sites that retrieve our feed to display on their own site and make it look like their own content. This way we are at least saving the bandwidth that these people would be using of ours.

TheSlasher wrote:
Why on earth did Mozilla have ugly grey as the active tab colour? And dark grey for non-active? They didn’t do themselves any favors with FF 2.0.

I never really noticed that the active tab wasn’t very noticeable until I had seen the blue one. It is very hard to go back now.

gluon wrote:
Ryan: would you mind telling me the name of the windows style you used in the above screenshot? I’ve been looking for this whole-button-in-window-border vista-style quite some time now – whithout luck :?

thanks in advance ;)

Well, actually it is Windows Vista. :)

]]> By: gluon http://cybernetnews.com/you-age-so-shouldnt-your-firefox-tabs/comment-page-1/#comment-33386 gluon Tue, 07 Nov 2006 09:10:16 +0000 http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/11/06/you-age-so-shouldnt-your-firefox-tabs/#comment-33386 Ryan: would you mind telling me the name of the windows style you used in the above screenshot? I've been looking for this whole-button-in-window-border vista-style quite some time now - whithout luck :? thanks in advance ;) Ryan: would you mind telling me the name of the windows style you used in the above screenshot? I’ve been looking for this whole-button-in-window-border vista-style quite some time now – whithout luck :?

thanks in advance ;)

]]> By: TheSlasher http://cybernetnews.com/you-age-so-shouldnt-your-firefox-tabs/comment-page-1/#comment-33170 TheSlasher Tue, 07 Nov 2006 02:12:12 +0000 http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/11/06/you-age-so-shouldnt-your-firefox-tabs/#comment-33170 Why on earth did Mozilla have ugly grey as the active tab colour? And dark grey for non-active? They didn't do themselves any favors with FF 2.0. Why on earth did Mozilla have ugly grey as the active tab colour? And dark grey for non-active? They didn’t do themselves any favors with FF 2.0.

]]> By: netster007x http://cybernetnews.com/you-age-so-shouldnt-your-firefox-tabs/comment-page-1/#comment-33165 netster007x Tue, 07 Nov 2006 01:56:33 +0000 http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/11/06/you-age-so-shouldnt-your-firefox-tabs/#comment-33165 Looks, kinda cool, but I'm trying to be conservative in regard to system recources. Also, it's terribly annoying when I'm reading your tech news in the Y! Mail Beta RSS feed reader and there is a good picture of the feature you're explaining. If it's possible, I would greatly enjoy it if feed pictures were embedded into the RSS feed 8) Looks, kinda cool, but I’m trying to be conservative in regard to system recources.

Also, it’s terribly annoying when I’m reading your tech news in the Y! Mail Beta RSS feed reader and there is a good picture of the feature you’re explaining. If it’s possible, I would greatly enjoy it if feed pictures were embedded into the RSS feed 8)

]]> By: Ryan http://cybernetnews.com/you-age-so-shouldnt-your-firefox-tabs/comment-page-1/#comment-33056 Ryan Mon, 06 Nov 2006 20:18:24 +0000 http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/11/06/you-age-so-shouldnt-your-firefox-tabs/#comment-33056 <div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-33030">Jack wrote:</a><blockquote>Ridiculoso! FF2 goes easier on the RAM so extension developers are finding ingenious ways to offset that! :roll:</blockquote></div> I have not noticed any additional memory usage by using this extension. I'm sure there is a little bit of a hit but it doesn't appear to present any memory leaks. Jack wrote:
Ridiculoso! FF2 goes easier on the RAM so extension developers are finding ingenious ways to offset that! :roll:

I have not noticed any additional memory usage by using this extension. I’m sure there is a little bit of a hit but it doesn’t appear to present any memory leaks.

]]> By: Jack http://cybernetnews.com/you-age-so-shouldnt-your-firefox-tabs/comment-page-1/#comment-33030 Jack Mon, 06 Nov 2006 19:14:17 +0000 http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/11/06/you-age-so-shouldnt-your-firefox-tabs/#comment-33030 Ridiculoso! FF2 goes easier on the RAM so extension developers are finding ingenious ways to offset that! :roll: Ridiculoso! FF2 goes easier on the RAM so extension developers are finding ingenious ways to offset that! :roll:

]]> By: ffextensionguru http://cybernetnews.com/you-age-so-shouldnt-your-firefox-tabs/comment-page-1/#comment-33015 ffextensionguru Mon, 06 Nov 2006 18:23:29 +0000 http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/11/06/you-age-so-shouldnt-your-firefox-tabs/#comment-33015 Someone had mentioned this extension over at the <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/1368/" rel="nofollow">Colorful Tabs</a> which now works fine with 2.0) extension page. Frankly, I wasn't impressed. :cry: Someone had mentioned this extension over at the [addons.mozilla.org] which now works fine with 2.0) extension page. Frankly, I wasn’t impressed. :cry:

]]> By: Darshan http://cybernetnews.com/you-age-so-shouldnt-your-firefox-tabs/comment-page-1/#comment-33014 Darshan Mon, 06 Nov 2006 18:12:54 +0000 http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/11/06/you-age-so-shouldnt-your-firefox-tabs/#comment-33014 That is really really useful, especially since I always have 30 tabs open all of the time. Thanks for finding this. That is really really useful, especially since I always have 30 tabs open all of the time. Thanks for finding this.

]]>