Comments on: YouTube’s Copyright Filter Launches http://cybernetnews.com/youtubes-copyright-filter-launches/ Technology News Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:03:20 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Ashleyhttp://cybernetnews.com/youtubes-copyright-filter-launches/#comment-118445 Ashley Wed, 17 Oct 2007 02:02:06 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/16/youtubes-copyright-filter-launches/#comment-118445 At least they put the Beta tag on it so they have an excuse for any problems they run into! :) At least they put the Beta tag on it so they have an excuse for any problems they run into! :)

]]> By: Ryanhttp://cybernetnews.com/youtubes-copyright-filter-launches/#comment-118396 Ryan Tue, 16 Oct 2007 23:47:10 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/16/youtubes-copyright-filter-launches/#comment-118396 I'm sure there is some way for them to index certain frames throughout a video (maybe a frame every second) and compare that to what users are uploading. That would probably constitute "highly complicated". I’m sure there is some way for them to index certain frames throughout a video (maybe a frame every second) and compare that to what users are uploading. That would probably constitute “highly complicated”.

]]> By: CoryChttp://cybernetnews.com/youtubes-copyright-filter-launches/#comment-118390 CoryC Tue, 16 Oct 2007 23:32:06 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/16/youtubes-copyright-filter-launches/#comment-118390 As I understand it, Google will use the video that the content owner provides and use it to make a unique hash (basically a series of numbers and letters); they wouldn't need to keep the video.Also, since simple adding or removing any of the a few seconds to the video would create a different hash, I don't see how the new system will be affective. A user could change the video contract or color or add background sound etc and the hash would no longer match the hash generated by the contents owned original video. I guess that's where the "highly complicated technology platform" comes in. They have to be able to tell if the original video has been modified. As I understand it, Google will use the video that the content owner provides and use it to make a unique hash (basically a series of numbers and letters); they wouldn’t need to keep the video.

Also, since simple adding or removing any of the a few seconds to the video would create a different hash, I don’t see how the new system will be affective. A user could change the video contract or color or add background sound etc and the hash would no longer match the hash generated by the contents owned original video. I guess that’s where the “highly complicated technology platform” comes in. They have to be able to tell if the original video has been modified.

]]>